PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 15, 2025Frontiers in Oncology8 citationsOpen Access

Histological and immunohistochemical approaches to molecular subtyping in muscle-invasive bladder cancer

View Full Paper
GAGiulio AttanasioMFMaria FaillaSPSimone Poidomani

Key Points

  • Muscle-invasive bladder cancer presents significant heterogeneity, complicating diagnosis and management.
  • Distinct histological variants are linked to specific prognoses and treatment responses.
  • Recent genomic profiling has identified four molecular subtypes, each with unique traits and treatment sensitivities.
  • Integrating histology and immunohistochemistry can improve accessibility of diagnosis and inform personalized treatment paths.

Abstract

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive form of bladder cancer, representing 20–25% of all bladder cancer cases. Characterized by invasion into the detrusor muscle, MIBC often leads to high rates of metastasis and poor outcomes, with five-year survival rates below 50% for localized disease and less than 15% for metastatic cases. MIBC primarily affects older adults, especially men, with smoking and chemical exposure being the leading risk factors. Clinically, MIBC presents significant heterogeneity, both histologically and molecularly, making diagnosis and management challenging. Histological variants of MIBC, such as squamous, micropapillary, plasmacytoid, and neuroendocrine subtypes, are associated with distinct prognoses and variable treatment responses. Recent advances in genomic profiling have identified molecular subtypes of MIBC—luminal, basal/squamous, neuronal, and stroma-rich—each with unique biological characteristics and treatment sensitivities. Despite these advancements, the widespread adoption of molecular profiling is hindered by the high costs and limited availability of these technologies, particularly in resource-limited settings. As a result, there is an increasing need for alternative, more accessible diagnostic methods to predict molecular subtypes. In this context, histological examination combined with immunohistochemical markers, such as GATA3, KRT5/6, and p63, has been shown to reliably correlate with molecular subtypes and guide therapeutic decisions. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of how histology, immunohistochemistry and molecular subtyping can be integrated into routine clinical practice to inform treatment strategies for MIBC, providing a pathway toward more personalized and effective management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Attanasio et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a02bce6551bb0af8cc59dhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1546160
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper