PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 16, 2025Journal of the American Heart Association16 citationsOpen Access

Cardiovascular Health, 2010 to 2020: A Systematic Review of a Decade of Research on Life's Simple 7

View Full Paper
LALiliana AguayoCCCrina CotocJGJames Guo

Key Points

  • Overall findings show ideal cardiovascular health significantly benefits multiple body systems across ages.
  • Research indicates low prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health globally, especially among underrepresented groups.
  • Longitudinal studies demonstrate cardiovascular health declines with age, with disparities linked to various social factors.
  • Mechanistic studies suggest benefits of ideal health relate to reduced inflammation and unknown pathways.

Abstract

In 2010, the American Heart Association introduced Life's Simple 7, a construct to measure, monitor, and modify cardiovascular health (CVH) across the lifespan. We aimed to summarize the knowledge on outcomes, prevalence, determinants, and mechanisms of Life's Simple 7. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for publications in English examining Life's Simple 7 or 3 or more CVH metrics from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2021. Risk of bias was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for studies of outcomes, prevalence, and determinants. Of 4624 publications screened, 483 were included; most had low risk of bias. Studies of outcomes (n=259) showed that ideal/high CVH (score ≥12/14 or 6/7 ideal metrics) consistently associates with benefits in multiple bodily systems from brain to toe and from gestation to extreme old age. Low prevalence of ideal/high CVH (n=84) was reported worldwide. Longitudinal studies (n=144) showed CVH is higher at younger ages and declines with age. CVH disparities persist, with lower CVH among underrepresented individuals, in lower levels of urbanization, and greater exposure to adverse social determinants. Studies of mechanisms (n=23) showed the benefits of ideal/high CVH are partly due to lower inflammation and pathways yet to be defined. Less is known about CVH among children and diverse populations, the benefits of modest improvements, and underlying mechanisms. Consistent evidence supports targeting social, psychological, and prenatal factors to improve individual and population CVH across the lifespan. Publication bias and overrepresentation of studies reporting significant associations cannot be excluded.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aguayo et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a02c3e6551bb0af8cccd5https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.124.038566
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ideal Cardiovascular Health and Cognitive Aging in the Northern Manhattan Study2016 · 96 citations
  2. 2Ideal cardiovascular health score and incident end-stage renal disease in a community-based longitudinal cohort study: the Kailuan Study2016 · 23 citations
  3. 3Ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics and Incidence of Ischemic Stroke Among Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study2020 · 14 citations
  4. 4Relationship between cardiovascular health score and year-to-year blood pressure variability in China: a prospective cohort study2015 · 7 citations
  5. 5Greater Adherence to Life’s Simple 7 Is Associated With Less Arterial Stiffness: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study2019 · 23 citations