PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 21, 2025Applied System Innovation28 citationsOpen Access

A Systematic Review of Responsible Artificial Intelligence Principles and Practice

View Full Paper
LGLakshitha GunasekaraLa Trobe UniversityNENicole El-HaberLa Trobe UniversitySNSwati NagpalLa Trobe University

Key Points

  • The review investigates responsible AI principles and practices, addressing key challenges and risks.
  • Out of 22,711 articles, the final analysis includes 553 relevant studies, providing significant insights.
  • Principle proliferation in responsible AI highlights the need for a coherent framework across diverse applications and stakeholders.
  • Findings aim to advance understanding and promote informed implementation of responsible AI practices.

Abstract

The accelerated development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities and systems is driving a paradigm shift in productivity, innovation and growth. Despite this generational opportunity, AI is fraught with significant challenges and risks. To address these challenges, responsible AI has emerged as a modus operandi that ensures protections while not stifling innovations. Responsible AI minimizes risks to people, society, and the environment. However, responsible AI principles and practice are impacted by ‘principle proliferation’ as they are diverse and distributed across the applications, stakeholders, risks, and downstream impact of AI systems. This article presents a systematic review of responsible AI principles and practice with the objectives of discovering the current state, the foundations and the need for responsible AI, followed by the principles of responsible AI, and translation of these principles into the responsible practice of AI. Starting with 22,711 relevant peer-reviewed articles from comprehensive bibliographic databases, the review filters through to 9700 at de-duplication, 5205 at abstract screening, 1230 at semantic screening and 553 at final full-text screening. The analysis of this final corpus is presented as six findings that contribute towards the increased understanding and informed implementation of responsible AI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gunasekara et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a060ee6551bb0af8cd3d0https://doi.org/10.3390/asi8040097
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Super AI, Generative AI, Narrow AI and Chatbots: An Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for The Public Sector and Public Administration2024 · 32 citations
  2. 2The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Personalizing Online Learning2024 · 25 citations
  3. 3The simple macroeconomics of AI2024 · 240 citations
  4. 4Challenges of responsible AI in practice: scoping review and recommended actions2024 · 72 citations
  5. 5Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks2024 · 64 citations