PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 31, 2025PeerJ Computer Science23 citationsOpen Access

Multi-objective optimization for smart cities: a systematic review of algorithms, challenges, and future directions

View Full Paper
YCYifan ChenWCWeng Howe ChanESEileen Lee Ming Su

Key Points

  • Multi-objective optimization is critical for sustainable urban planning and real-time decision-making.
  • The review evaluates 117 studies, categorizing algorithms into families like machine-learning-enhanced and bio-inspired.
  • Challenges include low interpretability of AI models and limited generalizability across urban domains.
  • A roadmap is provided for future research, including gaps in privacy-reserving optimization and integration with digital twins.

Abstract

With the growing complexity and interdependence of urban systems, multi-objective optimization (MOO) has become a critical tool for smart-city planning, sustainability, and real-time decision-making. This article presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of 117 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025, assessing the evolution, classification, and performance of MOO techniques in smart-city contexts. Existing algorithms are organised into four families—bio-inspired, mathematical theory-driven, physics-inspired, and machine-learning-enhanced—and benchmarked for computational efficiency, scalability, and scenario suitability across six urban domains: infrastructure, energy, transportation, Internet of Things (IoT)/cloud systems, agriculture, and water management. While established methods such as Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOED/D) remain prevalent, hybrid frameworks that couple deep learning with evolutionary search display superior adaptability in high-dimensional, dynamic environments. Persistent challenges include limited cross-domain generalisability, inadequate uncertainty handling, and low interpretability of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted models. Twelve research gaps are synthesised—from privacy-preserving optimisation and sustainable trade-off resolution to integration with digital twins, large language models, and neuromorphic computing—and a roadmap towards scalable, interpretable, and resilient optimisation frameworks is outlined. Finally, a ready-to-use benchmarking toolkit and a deployment-oriented algorithm-selection matrix are provided to guide researchers, engineers, and policy-makers in real-world smart-city applications. This review targets interdisciplinary researchers, optimisation developers, and smart-city practitioners seeking to apply or advance MOO techniques in complex urban systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0c5fe6551bb0af8cf60bhttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3042
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper