PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 31, 20250 citations

Pulsed Magnetic Field Therapy for Gait and Spasticity Management in Children With Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Review Article

View Full Paper
MHMuhammad HaroonTJTehreem JameelARAnbreena Rasool

Key Points

  • Pulsed magnetic field therapy may significantly reduce spasticity and enhance gait performance in children with BSCP.
  • A notable 23.7% reduction in soleus tendon reflex amplitude was observed in one of the studies with p < 0.001.
  • The review included studies with participant sizes ranging from 1 to 38, focusing on various outcomes related to gait and spasticity.
  • Further large-scale, long-term randomized trials are necessary to validate the effectiveness of PMF therapy and to develop clinical guidelines.

Abstract

Background: Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy (BSCP) is one of the most prevalent subtypes of cerebral palsy, affecting approximately 2.11 per 1,000 live births. It results from early brain injury and is characterized by persistent spasticity and impaired gait. Trunk and gluteal muscle stiffness severely impact the quality of life and motor function in affected children. Conventional therapies often provide only limited relief, prompting exploration of newer, non-invasive neuromodulatory treatments such as Pulsed Magnetic Field (PMF) therapy. Objective: This review aimed to systematically evaluate the available evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of PMF, particularly repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS), in managing spasticity and improving gait performance in pediatric patients with BSCP. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar using keywords including "Pulsed Magnetic Field," "Spasticity," "Cerebral Palsy," "Children," and "Gait," combined with Boolean operators. Studies published in English up to 2018 were considered. Inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, and observational studies involving children with BSCP, utilizing PMF therapy as the primary intervention. Primary outcome measures included the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL). Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria, involving sample sizes ranging from 1 to 38 participants. A 23.7% reduction in soleus tendon reflex amplitude was reported in one study (p < 0.001), while another demonstrated significant upper limb spasticity reduction and EEG-confirmed cortical modulation (p < 0.05). Functional improvements persisted up to 40 days post-intervention in single-subject follow-ups. Conclusion: PMF therapy shows promise as a non-invasive approach to reduce spasticity and enhance gait in BSCP. However, more large-scale, long-term randomized trials with standardized protocols are essential to confirm its efficacy and establish clinical guidelines.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haroon et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0c5fe6551bb0af8cf681https://doi.org/10.71000/zek6sr39
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Transcranial Photobiomodulation for Spasticity in Pediatric Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review of Neurodevelopmental Considerations, Treatment Protocols, Functional Outcomes, and Methodological Gaps2026
  2. 2Efficacy of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb motor function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Versus Sham Stimulation on Upper Limb Spasticity After Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial2026
  4. 4Medical Rehabilitation in Patient with Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegic GMFCS IV MACS I CFCS IV EDACS II2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Efficacy and safety of low- and high-intensity magnetic field therapies for orthopedic pain: a systematic review2026