PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Planck Constants as Collapse Boundaries: A Structural Framing of Quantum Evolution in Substrate Theory

View Full Paper
MBMichael Bush

Key Points

  • Main finding: The study reinterprets Planck constants as causal boundaries in quantum evolution, shifting from abstraction to structural significance.
  • Key evidence: It demonstrates that collapse events can be framed as necessary structural re-locks at the end of coherence intervals.
  • Approach: This work uses a substrate theory that integrates Lorentz compatibility, preserving the predictions of quantum mechanics and field theory.
  • Significance: This model provides a new understanding of measurement and entanglement, addressing paradoxes in quantum time asymmetry and maintaining predictive integrity.

Abstract

Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory (QM/QFT) offer precise mathematical tools for describing microscopic systems, but remain ambiguous with regard to the precise nature of collapse, measurement, and causal structure. This work introduces a structural reinterpretation of quantum evolution grounded in a conserved, Lorentz-compatible coherence substrate. Within this framework, wavefunctions are understood as phase-supported structures that evolve over finite causal intervals bounded by collapse events. We propose that Planck’s constant encodes structural thresholds of the substrate’s capacity to support coherent evolution. These limits define a minimum spatial and temporal envelope—referred to as the coherence tick—during which standard QM/QFT behavior is valid. Collapse is not introduced as a measurement postulate, but emerges as a necessary structural re-lock at the end of each coherence interval. The Collapse Boundary is thus a physically meaningful event horizon, and if energy or configuration offload is required, a Quantum Emission Opportunity (QEO) occurs. This framework preserves all predictive results of QM/QFT while offering a physically causal explanation for collapse timing, wavefunction termination, and entanglement. It resolves the quantum time asymmetry paradox by distinguishing between internal evolution (experienced in +t) and external observation (reconstructed in −t). By reinterpreting Planck constants as causal boundary conditions rather than universal abstractions, this model provides a substrate-based foundation beneath conventional quantum dynamics—one in which measurement, correlation, and irreversibility arise from finite structural support, not observer-induced discontinuity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Michael Bush (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0c6be6551bb0af8cfbe3https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202507.2530.v2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper