PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 11, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Cellular and circuit features distinguish dentate gyrus semilunar granule cells and granule cells activated during contextual memory formation

View Full Paper
LDLaura DovekMAMahboubeh AhmadiKMKrista Marrero

Key Points

  • Semilunar granule cells were found to exhibit greater sustained firing compared to granule cells, indicating increased excitability during memory tasks.
  • Excitatory synaptic inputs were more frequent in labeled granule cells and semilunar granule cells than their unlabeled counterparts, supporting enhanced recruitment.
  • Recordings revealed no glutamatergic connections between behaviorally labeled semilunar granule cells and granule cells, challenging existing hypotheses.
  • Findings suggest that intrinsic properties and correlated inputs play a significant role in semilunar granule cell recruitment to memory engrams.

Abstract

The dentate gyrus is critical for spatial memory formation and shows task related activation of cellular ensembles considered as memory engrams. Semilunar granule cells (SGCs), a sparse dentate projection neuron subtype distinct from granule cells (GCs), were recently reported to be enriched among behaviorally activated neurons. However, the mechanisms governing SGC recruitment during memory formation and their role in engram refinement remains unresolved. By examining neurons labeled during contextual memory formation in TRAP2 mice, we empirically tested competing hypotheses for GC and SGC recruitment into memory ensembles. In support of the proposal that more excitable neurons are preferentially recruited into memory ensembles, SGCs showed greater sustained firing than GCs. Additionally, SGCs labeled during memory formation showed less adapting firing than unlabeled SGCs. Our recordings did not reveal glutamatergic connections between behaviorally labeled SGCs and GCs, providing evidence against SGC driven local circuit feedforward excitation in ensemble recruitment. Contrary to a leading hypothesis, there was little evidence for individual SGCs or labeled neuronal ensembles supporting lateral inhibition of unlabeled neurons. Instead, labeled GCs and SGCs received more spontaneous excitatory synaptic inputs than their unlabeled counterparts. Moreover, pairs of GCs and SGCs within labeled neuronal cohorts received more temporally correlated spontaneous excitatory synaptic inputs than labeled-unlabeled neuronal pairs, validating a role for correlated afferent inputs in neuronal ensemble selection. These findings challenge the proposal that SGCs drive dentate GC ensemble refinement, while supporting a role for intrinsic active properties and correlated inputs in preferential SGC recruitment to contextual memory engrams.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dovek et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a35eeb0a429f797332802bhttps://doi.org/10.7554/elife.101428.2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper