PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 11, 2025Journal of the American Philosophical Association1 citations

Welfare Subjects and Autopoiesis

View Full Paper
DBDonald W. Bruckner

Key Points

  • All autopoietic entities are welfare subjects, challenging standard beliefs about sentience and welfare.
  • Autopoiesis refers to self-production that is adaptive, distinguishing between different types of subjects.
  • The article argues that while sentient beings qualify as welfare subjects, non-sentient entities do not share this status.
  • Understanding the characteristics of welfare subjects may reshape discussions on ethics and treatment of various entities.

Abstract

ABSTRACT A welfare subject is an entity with a good of its own. Welfare subjects have interests. Things matter to them. It is uncontroversial that typical adult humans are welfare subjects. It is uncontroversial that rocks are not welfare subjects. Just what makes this so is a matter of controversy. The default view is that sentience is necessary for welfare subjecthood. A competing view is that teleological organization suffices for welfare subjecthood. This article challenges both views by developing a third view that sits between them. An autopoietic entity is one that engages in self-production in a way that is adaptive to its environment. An autopoietic entity sustains, maintains, and renews itself on an ongoing basis. This article argues that all autopoietic entities are welfare subjects. This view explains why sentient entities such as animals are welfare subjects. It explains why merely teleologically organized entities such as automobile engines are not.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Donald W. Bruckner (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a360ce0a429f7973328aebhttps://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2025.10006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Welfare Subjectivism, Sophistication, and Procedural Perfectionism2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Minds Matter2026
  3. 3Welfare-Relevant Behaviors Without Welfare Subjects: Configuration-Level Evidence from Longitudinal Human-AI Interaction2026
  4. 4From Subjectivism and Pure Objectivism to Conditional Objectivism: A Criticism and Revision of Richard Arneson’s Theory of Welfare2026
  5. 5How Seriously Should We Take AI Welfare? Constraints From the Epistemology of Consciousness2026