PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 11, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Interval Carbon Price Prediction Based on Deep Error Correction and Bivariate Kernel Density Estimation

View Full Paper
JHJiankun HuXJXiaoheng JiHWHaiji Wang

Key Points

  • The model achieves an R² greater than 0.99, indicating highly accurate carbon price predictions.
  • Forecast accuracy is further supported by a PICP greater than 0.95, demonstrating effective error handling.
  • The four-stage forecasting model employs techniques like TCN-Transformer and LSTM for better adaptability.
  • Findings emphasize the potential to support the dual-carbon strategy, enhancing low-carbon transition efforts.

Abstract

The core value of carbon price forecasting lies in reducing uncertainty in carbon markets and promoting the transition to a low-carbon economy. Although significant progress has been made in current carbon price forecasting models, challenges remain in the adaptability of second decomposition algorithms, the depth extraction capability of error correction algorithms, and the handling of non-normality and heteroscedasticity in carbon price data through interval algorithms. To address these issues, this paper proposes a four-stage carbon price forecasting model. First, a second decomposition is performed using ICEEMDAN-VMD optimized by the Difference Innovation Search Algorithm (DCS) and the Central Frequency Method. Next, the TCN-Transformer is used to model the decomposed components separately, with their linear summation providing the preliminary forecast. Then, an improved second decomposition algorithm (ISD) and LSTM are applied to build a deep error correction model, aiming to extract the predictable components from the preliminary forecast errors. Finally, a Bivariate Kernel Density Estimation (BKDE) is constructed using the forecast values and error values from the training set to generate interval prediction results. Case studies from Hubei and Guangzhou demonstrate that the model achieves an R² greater than 0.99 and a PICP greater than 0.95, significantly outperforming existing methods and effectively supporting the implementation of the dual-carbon strategy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a360d60a429f7973328f9bhttps://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202507.1251.v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper