PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 17, 2025Astronomy and Astrophysics7 citations

The cosmological lithium problem

View Full Paper
OMOswaldo D. Miranda

Key Points

  • No discrepancy exists between primordial nucleosynthesis predictions and observed lithium abundance, suggesting refined models are necessary.
  • Observations reveal that lithium abundance aligns with a standard chemical evolution model when linked to cosmic star formation rates.
  • Analysis included data from metal-poor stars and the Small Magellanic Cloud to determine lithium abundance variations and their origins.
  • Formation events of specific stars such as J0023+0307 and SMSS J0313-6708 align with contributions from Population III stars, highlighting early Universe dynamics.

Abstract

The discrepancy between the predictions of primordial nucleosynthesis and the observed lithium abundance in Spite plateau stars has been attributed either to a challenge to the standard model of nucleosynthesis or to stellar processes occurring after the stars formed. To understand the origin of this discrepancy, it is crucial to link the cosmic star formation rate with a chemical enrichment model that incorporates the yields of both Population (Pop) III and II stars. It is within this framework that the evolution of lithium can be determined. The primary goal is to demonstrate that there is no discrepancy between the predictions of primordial nucleosynthesis and the observed lithium abundance. By combining a standard chemical evolution model with the hierarchical structure formation scenario, it is possible to determine the lithium abundance as a function of Fe/H. The model's results are compared with observational data from extremely metal-poor stars, Spite plateau stars, Gaia-Enceladus sources, the Small Magellanic Cloud, lithium abundances in Solar System meteorites, and two extremely iron-poor stars: J0023+0307 and SMSS J0313--6708. The Spite plateau is naturally established in the range -8. 0 łesssim Fe/H łesssim -2. 0 with ^ Li/H ∼ 1. 81. We find that J0023+0307 could have formed ∼ 4. 4 years after the explosion of the first Pop III star in the Universe, whereas for SMSS J0313--6708 this event would have occurred ∼ 2. 2 years later. The Spite plateau serves as an observational signature of the formation of Pop III stars. The abundances observed in J0023+0307 and SMSS J0313--6708 are consistent with Pop III progenitor stars in the mass range 10-100 M_⊙. However, if some high-redshift star formation occurs within subhalo-like structures, the contribution of stars in the mass range 140-260 M_⊙ to the formation of the extended Spite plateau cannot be ruled out.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oswaldo D. Miranda (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a36a360a429f797332e31chttps://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554482
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Primordial nucleosynthesis with varying fundamental constants2021 · 29 citations
  2. 2The evolution of Lithium: implications of a universal Spite plateau2021 · 20 citations
  3. 3Connecting the Cosmic Star Formation Rate with the Local Star Formation2017 · 10 citations
  4. 4Chemical Abundance Signature of J0023+0307: A Second-generation Main-sequence Star with [Fe/H] < −6*2019 · 54 citations
  5. 5Cosmological evolution of the nitrogen abundance2018 · 24 citations