PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 17, 2025Land13 citationsOpen Access

Assessing the Impact of Urban Spatial Form on Land Surface Temperature Using Random Forest—Taking Beijing as a Case Study

View Full Paper
RHRonghai HeJWJiahui WangDLDongyun Liu

Key Points

  • The random forest model achieves the highest predictive accuracy at a 600 m scale, indicating significant advantages over linear models.
  • It shows that two-dimensional indicators dominate at medium to large scales, while three-dimensional indicators are more influential at smaller scales.
  • The analysis uses a multiscale grid system to quantify urban spatial form, focusing on 14 morphological indicators.
  • Machine learning offers robust technical support for understanding the complexities of land surface temperature in urban settings.

Abstract

To examine the integrated influence of urban spatial form on the urban heat island (UHI) effect, this study selects the area within Beijing’s Fifth Ring Road as a case study. A multiscale grid system is established to quantify fourteen two- and three-dimensional morphological indicators. A Random Forest algorithm is employed to assess the relative importance of each factor. The optimal analytical scale for each key variable is then identified, and its nonlinear relationship with land surface temperature (LST) is analyzed at that scale. The main findings are as follows: (1) The Random Forest model achieves the highest predictive accuracy at a 600 m scale, significantly outperforming traditional linear models by effectively addressing multicollinearity. This suggests that machine learning offers robust technical support for UHI research. (2) Form variables exhibit distinct scale dependencies. Two-dimensional indicators dominate at medium to large scales, while three-dimensional indicators are more influential at smaller scales. Specifically, the mean building height is most significant at the 150 m scale, the standard deviation of building height at 300 m, and the impervious surface fraction at 600–1200 m. (3) Strong nonlinear effects are identified. The bare soil fraction below 0.12 intensifies surface warming; the water body fraction between 0.20 and 0.35 provides the strongest cooling; plant coverage offers maximum cooling between 0.25 and 0.45; building density cools below 0.3 buildings/hm2 but contributes to warming beyond this threshold; building coverage ratio generates the greatest warming between 0.08 and 0.32; height variability provides optimal cooling between 8 m and 40 m; and mean building height shows a positive correlation with LST below 6 m but a negative one above that height.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

He et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a36a360a429f797332e5e6https://doi.org/10.3390/land14081639
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper