PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 17, 2025Religions3 citationsOpen Access

The Historical Evolution and Indigenous Pathways of Christian–Buddhist Dialogue in China: A Perspective from Religious Dialogue Theories

View Full Paper
ZSZiyin ShangLLLimin Liu

Key Points

  • Interfaith dialogue has evolved from mutual exclusivity to more inclusive engagement between Buddhism and Christianity, showing progress in their relationships.
  • Key thinkers like Zhang Chunyi and Xu Dishan advocated for pluralistic interpretations and aestheticized pluralism, enriching ethical dialogues.
  • The shift towards comparative theology emphasizes deeper understanding of core doctrines and shared ethical practices in religious interactions.
  • These developments point to significant changes in religious dialogue theories and showcase Eastern contributions to the discussion of interfaith dialogue.

Abstract

The early encounters between Buddhism and Christianity in China were primarily characterized by mutual exclusivity and competition. By the Republic of China era, both traditions faced mounting pressures—Buddhism under the impact of modernization, and Christianity in its efforts toward indigenization—which prompted a shift toward inclusive engagement and mutual learning. However, their interactions often remained limited to superficial formalities due to an instrumental approach that treated the other as a means to an end. During the early modern period, some pioneering thinkers began exploring core doctrines from a pluralistic perspective: Zhang Chunyi’s concept of “Buddhicized Christianity” sought to deconstruct essentialist views using the Buddhist wisdom of śūnyatā (emptiness), offering an Eastern philosophical pathway for religious dialogue. Xu Dishan, on the other hand, employed the literature as a medium to transcend doctrinal differences by emphasizing shared ethical practices, thereby constructing what can be termed “aestheticized pluralism”. In the contemporary context of globalization, scholars increasingly rely on comparative theology and comparative religious studies to enable deeper mutual interpretation of core doctrines, bringing more mature forms of interfaith dialogue. These dialogue practices demonstrate unique paradigm shifts and reflections on Western theories of religious dialogue, contributing Eastern-inspired insights for contemporary religious dialogue.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a36a480a429f797332eb3ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rel16081047
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper