PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 17, 2025ADVANCES IN BUSINESS RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL0 citations

A Possible Compatibility of Buddhist and Western Economics: a Cohesiveness Agendum to the Emerging Global Issues

View Full Paper
DWDorji WangchukTSTara Subba

Key Points

  • The compatibility of buddhist and western economics may enhance global well-being, contributing to sustainability.
  • Findings indicate a cohesive solution to global issues based on a review of 66 articles on economic principles.
  • Analysis used constant comparison and QUAL techniques, focusing on themes of happiness and economic policies.
  • Calls for policymakers to reexamine economic strategies to better serve the well-being of people globally.

Abstract

The principles of Buddhist economics have commenced to gain impetus among the business and well-being scholars, however, with little impact on the negligence and constriction principles of Western economics. Therefore, this review article explores the conceptualism dichotomy of Buddhist economics and Western economics, and principles of Buddhist economics as a pragmatic way of attaining sustainable well-being and happiness. In addition, the article examines the reliability of Buddhist economics as an economic development policy. Articles were retrieved from the web-based databases and academic search engines using thematic key words like Buddhist economics, Western economics, well-being, happiness and global issues. The data generated through detailed reading of the 66 articles were analysed within and across using constant comparison analysis technique of QUAL approach. The findings suggest that the compatibility of Buddhist and Western economics is a cohesive solution to the emerging global issues. This article also draws attention of the policymakers and economic experts to reexamine their economic policies for the common well-being of global populace and the sustainability of the economy itself.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wangchuk et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a370e20a429f797333301fhttps://doi.org/10.24191/abrij.v6i2.4188
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper