PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 19, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Assessing inversion uncertainty from initial model variability: A practical approach for geothermal MT exploration

View Full Paper
SASuzuki Atsushi

Key Points

  • Final resistivity models show significant variability based on initial resistivity structures, underscoring the importance of initial models.
  • Key evidence from field data in the Yuzawa geothermal field highlights variability in resistivity models with RMS values ≤ 2.15.
  • Assessment using 3D inversions demonstrates how spatially variable uncertainties can influence geothermal drilling decisions.
  • This approach supports efficient uncertainty assessment, aiding in practical geothermal applications and reservoir modeling.

Abstract

We propose a simple and computationally efficient approach to evaluate the uncertainty in magnetotelluric (MT) inversion results arising from differences in initial models. Spatially smooth initial resistivity structures are generated by assigning random resistivity values to fixed representative points and applying Kriging-based interpolation. A series of 3D inversions was conducted using these initial models, and the variability in the resulting resistivity distributions was analyzed. Results from field data acquired in the Yuzawa geothermal field (northeastern Japan) demonstrate that even when using the same dataset and inversion parameters, the final resistivity models exhibit meaningful variability depending on the initial model. The selected cases with final RMS values ≤ 2.15 reveal spatial patterns in uncertainty: the smaller-area realizations were entirely encompassed within the larger-area realizations at a depth of 1000 m, indicating a conductive core region that is common to all realizations, while the spatial extent of C1 became more variable among realizations in the eastern region with increasing depth, reflecting greater uncertainty. This spatially variable uncertainty can guide the planning of drilling and geophysical surveys. Furthermore, the distribution of isosurface volumes below a given resistivity threshold enables the construction of optimistic and pessimistic scenarios for reservoir modeling. The proposed approach is scalable and well-suited for practical geothermal applications where efficient and feasible uncertainty assessment is required. This method provides a practical framework for evaluating geothermal potential.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suzuki Atsushi (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af453fad7bf08b1ead2da7https://doi.org/10.31223/x5nm9x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Three-dimensional magnetotelluric Bayesian inversion based on Stein variational gradient descent2026
  2. 2Joint 3D resistivity inversion of ground-based MT and CSEM data to improve resolution for deep mineral exploration2026
  3. 3Spatial uncertainty constraints reduce overfitting for potential field geophysical inversion2026 · 1 citations
  4. 43D magnetotelluric constrained inversion integrating realistic structural and rock-physics information: A case study in Tongling ore district2026
  5. 5Uncertainty quantification in electrical resistivity tomography inversion: hybridizing block-wise bootstrapping with geostatistics2024 · 9 citations