PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 18, 2025Behavioral Ecology3 citations

Predator activity and scent cues influence white-tailed deer behavior in a multi-predator landscape

View Full Paper
MWMatthew A. WuenschTMTony W. MongBSBrandon M. Scurlock

Key Points

  • Deer in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem showed decreased diurnal activity and increased nocturnal activity in response to predator scents.
  • Camera traps revealed that deer spatially avoided grizzly bears while aligning their activity with bear detections over time.
  • In Ohio, deer did not change their activity patterns based on predator-scent cues, suggesting they are naïve to such risks.
  • The study highlights that scent cues alone do not affect deer spatial activity, with implications for understanding predator-prey dynamics.

Abstract

Abstract When navigating landscapes, prey make decisions that balance their need to acquire high-quality resources with the risk of predation. When risk is heterogenous across the landscape, prey can alter their habitat use to avoid high-risk patches or they can employ behavioral modifications, such as shifting their temporal activity, that allow them to continue to use high-risk patches while offsetting risk. Our objective was to discern how white-tailed deer in a predator-rich environment (the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem GYE) and an environment containing only mesopredators (Ohio, USA) respond to predator urine cues and predator activity. We used camera traps to quantify the spatiotemporal activity of deer before, during, and after applying predator-scent cues (control/water, wolf urine, mountain lion urine, and coyote urine). In the GYE, deer decreased diurnal activity in response to all predator-scent cues, and increased nocturnal activity in response to wolf, mountain lion, and control scents. Deer also spatially avoided the physical presence of grizzly bears and temporally aligned their activity patterns with bears as bear detections increased over time. In Ohio, deer did not alter their spatial or temporal activity in response to predator-scent cues, and we found that deer activity was positively associated with coyote activity, thereby suggesting that deer may be naïve to the predator-scent cues in this region. Our study shows that scent cues alone do not alter the spatial activity of deer, but in regions where deer are not naïve to the risk of predation, they may exhibit changes in their temporal activity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wuensch et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4546ad7bf08b1ead2f45https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araf091
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper