PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 19, 2025Diabetes Care7 citationsOpen Access

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Secondary Analysis of the DiGest Trial

View Full Paper
LKLaura C. KusinskiNANooria AttaDJDanielle L. Jones

Key Points

  • Lower mean glucose levels were associated with reduced risks of large for gestational age and small for gestational age outcomes, indicating control is vital.
  • Participants with TIRp ≥90% and mean glucose <110 mg/dL experienced lower rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes, highlighting the importance of tight glucose monitoring.
  • A secondary analysis used logistic regression to explore associations between CGM parameters and pregnancy complications in women with gestational diabetes.
  • Findings indicate that maintaining specific CGM metrics can significantly improve birth outcomes, urging further investigation into personalized glucose targets.

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly used in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but optimal metrics, ranges, and targets in this population are undefined. We assessed associations between CGM metrics and pregnancy outcomes in GDM. During the DiGest study, 425 women with GDM (diagnosed at median IQR 25.1 18.3-27.7 weeks) and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 received a dietary intervention, with masked Dexcom G6 CGM at 29 (n = 361), 32 (n = 215), and 36 (n = 227) weeks' gestation. For this secondary analysis, we used logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves, and the Youden index to assess associations and predictive ability of CGM metrics, including pregnancy-specific time in range (TIRp) (63-140 mg/dL 3.5-7.8 mmol/L) and pregnancy outcomes. CGM metrics at 29 weeks were significantly associated with large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Participants achieving mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), TIRp ≥90%, or pregnancy-specific time above range (TARp) <10% at 29 weeks had a significantly lower risk of LGA (odds ratio OR 0.41 95% CI 0.22, 0.77, 0.38 0.20, 0.70, and 0.39 0.20, 0.73, respectively) and SGA (0.26 0.08, 0.79, 0.30 0.10, 0.91, and 0.19 0.06, 0.62, respectively). TARp <10% and mean nocturnal glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L) were associated with a reduced odds of preterm birth (OR 0.40 0.17, 0.94 and 0.42 0.19, 0.97, respectively). A stricter range (63-120 mg/dL 3.5-6.7 mmol/L) had similar performance overall, but had no single statistically robust TIR/TAR target across all outcomes. In women with GDM, CGM mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), ≥90% TIRp, or <10% TARp using a range of 63-140 mg/dL (3.5-7.8 mmol/L) at 29 weeks' gestation was associated with a low risk of suboptimal offspring outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kusinski et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4766ad7bf08b1ead49cdhttps://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0452
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Continuous glucose monitoring metrics and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes: a secondary analysis of the DiGest trial2025
  2. 265-OR: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Suboptimal Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Gestational Diabetes—Secondary Analysis of the DiGest Trial2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Women with Type 2 Diabetes in Pregnancy: The TIMELY Observational Cohort Study2026
  4. 41908-P: Continuous Glucose Monitor Metrics as Predictors for Obstetric Outcomes among Patients with Diabetes in Pregnancy2026
  5. 51243-P: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Gestational Diabetes—Relationship with Neonatal Outcomes and Postpartum Glucose Metabolism2024