PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 19, 2025Buildings0 citationsOpen Access

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Forces of Housing Price Differentiation in Qingdao, China: Insights from LISA Path and GTWR Models

View Full Paper
FYFeng YinYWYanjun Wang

Key Points

  • Housing prices in Qingdao display significant spatiotemporal heterogeneity, with multi-level transitions and spatial dependence.
  • Findings from LISA and GTWR models reveal shifts towards a polycentric spatial structure over 20 years, influenced by urban planning factors.
  • Inland areas experience negative impacts while central districts benefit from business and educational resources driving housing prices higher.
  • Implications suggest the need for equitable urban planning policies focusing on community attributes and amenity support across diverse regions.

Abstract

As China’s urbanization deepens, the spatial structure of residential areas and land use patterns has undergone profound transformations, with the differentiation of housing prices emerging as a key indicator of urban spatial dynamics and socioeconomic stratification. This study examines the spatial and temporal evolution of residential housing prices in Qingdao’s main urban area over a 20-year period, using data from three representative years (2003, 2013, and 2023) to capture key stages of change. It employs Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) spatial and temporal path and leap analyses, as well as Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (GTWR) modeling. The results show that Qingdao’s housing price patterns exhibit distinct spatiotemporal heterogeneity, characterized by multi-level transitions, leapfrog dynamics and strong spatial dependence. The urban center and coastal zones demonstrate positive synergistic growth, while some inland and peripheral areas show negative spatial coupling. Evident is the spatial restructuring from a monocentric to a polycentric pattern, driven by shifts in industrial layout, policy incentives, and transportation infrastructure. Key driving factors, such as community attributes, locational conditions, and amenity support, show differentiated impacts across regions and over time. Business agglomeration and educational resources are primary positive drivers in central districts, whereas natural environments and commercial density play a more complex role in peripheral areas. These findings provide empirical evidence to inform our understanding of housing market dynamics and offer insights into urban planning and the design of equitable policies in transitional urban systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yin et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af494dad7bf08b1ead4df1https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162941
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper