PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 19, 2025Current Oncology3 citationsOpen Access

Treatment Disparities, Heterogeneities, and Barriers to Access for Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A National Survey from Brazil

View Full Paper
HRHeloísa ResendeVAVinícius AguiarNSNataline Freitas de Azevedo Santos

Key Points

  • Significant treatment delays exist for patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in Brazil, indicating a need for intervention.
  • The median waiting time for surgery was 60 days in the public health system, compared to 30 days in private care, with statistical significance (p < 0.0001).
  • Preferred first-line treatment was endocrine therapy for 83.3% in public systems, though key medications like fulvestrant were only available to 48% of oncologists surveyed.
  • Availability of specialized palliative care was reported by 66% of respondents within the public system, contrasting with 82% in the private sector.

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among Brazilian women, with a high percentage of the cases diagnosed at advanced or metastatic stages (mBC). In Brazil, where 75% of the population depends on the resource-limited public health system (SUS), mBC poses significant treatment challenges and disparities. To characterize this scenario, we conducted an online survey assessing treatment strategies available for HER2-negative, hormone receptor (HR)-positive mBC across public and private health systems. The 48-question survey addressed topics such as waiting time (WT) from oncology unit entry to treatment initiation, availability of oncologic medications, and access to palliative and multidisciplinary care teams. Between 2 August 2022 and 30 September 2022, a total of 180 oncologists were invited, and 150 met the inclusion criteria. The median WT for surgery was 60 days in the SUS versus 30 days in the private sector (p < 0.0001), and for chemotherapy, 30 days in the SUS versus 15 days privately (p < 0.0001). Endocrine therapy was the preferred first-line treatment in the SUS (83.3%), while fulvestrant was available to only 48% of respondents. Additionally, specialized palliative care teams were available according to 66% of SUS respondents compared with 82% in the private system (p = 0.001). These findings underscore persistent disparities in mBC treatment, likely driven by limited governmental health investment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Resende et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4953ad7bf08b1ead4eebhttps://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080471
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Assistência Oncológica e os 30 Anos do Sistema Único de Saúde2019 · 19 citations
  2. 2The journey of breast cancer patient from self-perception of breast abnormalities to first cancer treatment- a sectional study in Sul Fluminense region-RJ-Brazil2023 · 8 citations
  3. 3Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline2016 · 658 citations
  4. 4Financial impact of centralized purchasing of rituximab by the Brazilian Ministry of Health for lymphoma treatment, 2015-2022: an exploratory study2025 · 2 citations
  5. 5Planning cancer control in Latin America and the Caribbean2013 · 505 citations