PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2025Physiological Reports16 citationsOpen Access

Validation of nocturnal resting heart rate and heart rate variability in consumer wearables

View Full Paper
MDMichael B. DialMHMonika HollanderEVEmaly Vatne

Key Points

  • Oura devices showed highest accuracy for resting heart rate and heart rate variability, outperforming others.
  • With Lin's Concordance over 0.98, Oura Gen 4 excelled in accuracy, indicating strong reliability as a health metric.
  • Assessment used nocturnal heart rate data from five wearables compared against a gold standard ECG reference.
  • Results emphasize continuous validation, essential for trustworthy consumer wearable health metrics.

Abstract

Abstract Modern wearable devices report several heart rate‐based nocturnal health metrics, including resting heart rate (RHR) and heart rate variability (HRV). The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of nocturnal RHR and HRV from five wearable devices (Garmin Fenix 6, Oura Generation 3, Oura Generation 4, Polar Grit X Pro, Oura Gen 4 (CCC = 0.99, MAPE = 5.96 ± 5.12%), Oura Gen 3 (CCC = 0.97, MAPE = 7.15 ± 5.48%). WHOOP showed moderate accuracy (CCC = 0.94, MAPE = 8.17 ± 10.49%), followed by poor agreement from both Garmin (CCC = 0.87, MAPE = 10.52 ± 8.63%) and Polar (CCC = 0.82, MAPE = 16.32 ± 24.39%). Oura devices showed the highest agreement for RHR and HRV, and WHOOP showed acceptable agreement, whereas Garmin Fenix and Polar demonstrated lower concordance, highlighting the importance of continuous validation and providing valuable benchmarks for clinicians, researchers, and consumers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dial et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4cd8ad7bf08b1ead6412https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70527
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper