PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 20, 2025Public Health Research & Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Why public health practitioners and researchers must stop using the term ‘culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD)’

View Full Paper
DPDavoud PourmarziLMLinda MurrayTZTehzeeb Zulfiqar

Key Points

  • The term 'CALD' may negatively impact migrants' sense of belonging to the Australian community, and should be avoided.
  • Using 'CALD' has become commonplace in public health, despite critiques from the affected communities.
  • The authors emphasize the need for rigorous data collection and analysis when discussing diverse populations.
  • Critically assessing language in public health helps minimize risks of harm and supports inclusivity.

Abstract

The term ‘culturally and linguistically diverse’ (CALD) is used in Australia to describe some groups of migrants. Implicitly, the term defines ‘others’ who are ‘different’ to the dominant normative Australian. The use of the term as standard language in health literature and public discourse has increased dramatically over the past decade. Australians who are labelled as CALD have argued that the term affects their sense of belonging to the Australian community. As public health researchers and practitioners, we must minimise potential risks of harm, maximise health benefits and ensure the rigour of our data collection, analysis and reporting methods. We argue that we must refrain from continuing to use this concept and that there is no need for a new label to categorise some members of our diverse Australian population as ‘others’.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pourmarzi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4cdfad7bf08b1ead65f3https://doi.org/10.1071/pu25003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper