PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 20, 2025Nanomaterials19 citationsOpen Access

Sustainable Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes: Life Cycle Assessment, Technologies, and Economic Insights

View Full Paper
DPDongjie PangWestern UniversityHWHaoyu WangWestern UniversityYZYimin ZengNatural Resources Canada

Key Points

  • Recycling cathodes from lithium-ion batteries significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions, promoting sustainability.
  • Technoeconomic simulations indicate that battery composition heavily influences recycling profitability due to varying costs.
  • The study systematically reviews technologies like pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy, noting their strengths and environmental impacts.
  • Integrating life cycle assessment is crucial for optimizing processes and ensuring the economic viability of lithium-ion battery recycling.

Abstract

Rapid growth of electric vehicles has increased demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), raising concerns regarding their end-of-life management. This study comprehensively evaluates the closed-loop recycling of cathode materials from spent LIBs by integrating life cycle assessment (LCA), technoeconomic analysis, and technological comparison. Typical approaches—including pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, and other processes such as organic acid leaching and in situ reduction roasting—are systematically reviewed. While pyrometallurgy offers scalability, it is hindered by high energy consumption and excessive greenhouse gas emissions. Hydrometallurgy achieves higher metal recovery rates with better environmental performance but requires complex chemical and wastewater management. Emerging methods and regeneration techniques such as co-precipitation and sol–gel synthesis demonstrate potential for high-purity material recovery and circular manufacturing. LCA results confirm that recycling significantly reduces GHG emissions, especially for high-nickel cathode chemistry. However, the environmental benefits are affected by upstream factors such as collection, disassembly, and logistics. Technoeconomic simulations show that profitability is strongly influenced by battery composition, regional cost structures, and collection rates. The study highlights the necessity of harmonized LCA boundaries, process optimization, and supportive policy frameworks to scale environmentally and economically sustainable LIB recycling, ensuring long-term supply security for critical battery materials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4cdfad7bf08b1ead673dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/nano15161283
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Screening Contract Excitation Models Involving Closed-Loop Supply Chains Under Asymmetric Information Games: A Case Study with New Energy Vehicle Power Battery2019 · 14 citations
  2. 2Policies and perspective on end-of-life vehicles in China2012 · 113 citations
  3. 3U.S. lithium resources from geothermal and extraction feasibility2021 · 65 citations
  4. 4A Review on Environmental, Economic and Hydrometallurgical Processes of Recycling Spent Lithium-ion Batteries2020 · 273 citations
  5. 5LCA for lithium battery recycling technology-recent progress2024 · 18 citations