PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 20, 2025International Journal for Research Publication and Seminars0 citationsOpen Access

Dowry Prohibition Act and the Role of Police and Judiciary: A Study in Delayed Justice and Procedural Gaps

View Full Paper
CSChitra Singh

Key Points

  • Legal remedies are hindered by delayed FIR registrations and flawed police investigations, leaving victims without recourse.
  • The study highlights that despite the dowry prohibition act, crimes against women persist due to systemic inadequacies.
  • An evaluation of landmark Supreme Court judgments reveals inconsistent judicial interpretations affecting justice delivery.
  • Reforms are urgently needed to improve investigation timelines and ensure women's protection in the judicial process.

Abstract

This research paper critically examines the legal and procedural framework governing dowryrelated offences in India, focusing on the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and its operational interface with the “Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023”, “Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023”, and “Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023”. Despite the presence of dedicated statutes criminalising the giving, taking, and demanding of dowry, the implementation of these laws remains fraught with systemic inefficiencies. The study evaluates the institutional roles of the police and judiciary, identifying persistent issues such as delayed FIR registration, flawed investigations, weak prosecutions, inconsistent judicial interpretations, and underutilization of statutory presumptions. Through an in-depth analysis of landmark Supreme Court judgments, procedural lacunae, and statutory under- enforcement, the paper reveals how legal remedies fail to translate into accessible justice for victims. It highlights how dowry-related crimes, particularly those resulting in cruelty or death, continue to be trivialised within India’s criminal justice system. The paper concludes by offering specific recommendations for structural and procedural reforms aimed at ensuring timely investigation, sensitive adjudication, and effective enforcement, thereby upholding the constitutional mandate of dignity, equality, and protection of women against exploitation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chitra Singh (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4cdfad7bf08b1ead67a6https://doi.org/10.36676/jrps.v16.i3.296
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper