PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 20, 2025Frontiers in Built Environment2 citationsOpen Access

The extended mind of public space: how urban design shapes human experience

View Full Paper
SGStefania GruossoMSMarcella Del SignoreACAndrea Di Cinzio

Key Points

  • Public spaces significantly shape human experience by influencing thoughts, behaviors, and social interactions, enhancing wellbeing.
  • Key findings show six design paradigms interact synergistically to foster inclusive, human-centered environments.
  • Qualitative analysis of two decades of case studies reveals innovative strategies in contemporary public spaces.
  • Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for urban design, integrating insights from architecture, neuroscience, and psychology.

Abstract

The current debate on urban design emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach that integrates spatial, cognitive, and experiential perspectives. This paper introduces the concept of “The Extended Mind of Public Space,” following a theoretical framework that explores how public spaces serve as extensions of human cognition, perception, and emotion. By shaping thoughts, behaviors, and social interactions, public spaces—such as squares, parks, and gathering places—become real laboratories for human experience and wellbeing. This study identifies and examines six design paradigms—ritual-based, body-based, sensory-based, atmospheric-based, performance-based, and intelligent/augmented-based—each addressing a unique interaction between the body, mind, senses, and the built environment. Using qualitative analysis of case studies from the past 20 years, the research highlights the innovative strategies employed in contemporary public spaces to foster urbanity and enhance human experiences. Key findings reveal that these paradigms are not isolated but interdependent, offering a synergistic framework for creating inclusive, human-centered public spaces. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, incorporating insights from architecture, neuroscience, and environmental psychology to design spaces that promote wellbeing, encourage participation, and positively influence behavior. The paper concludes by advocating for a typological upgrade of the existing public space definitions, aligning them with the cognitive city paradigm. This research establishes a methodological foundation for future scientific studies that integrate environmental psychology and neuroscience into urban planning, redefining urban design theories through a human-centered approach.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gruosso et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4eaead7bf08b1ead72abhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1504549
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses1996 · 1,485 citations
  2. 2The Extended Mind1998 · 5,352 citations
  3. 3Enactivist Interventions2017 · 857 citations
  4. 4Redefining the Smart City: Culture, Metabolism and Governance2018 · 508 citations
  5. 5The End of Public Space? People’s Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy2009 · 300 citations