PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2025Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology1 citations

EXPRESS: Can multiple-target search paradigms reliably discriminate serial and parallel search processes?

View Full Paper
YZYujie ZhengYPYuhang PanYXYu Xu

Key Points

  • The accuracy-based MTS effectively identified processing modes in visual searches, improving on previous methods.
  • Results indicated the new paradigm provided greater efficiency and reliability in distinguishing search processes.
  • Analysis focused on visual search tasks using enhanced multiple-target search techniques to assess processing modes.
  • Findings highlight the methodological shift may enable clearer understanding of cognitive processes in visual search.

Abstract

Distinguishing between serial and parallel processing modes in visual search tasks remains a challenge in cognitive psychology. The multiple target search (MTS) paradigm, which utilizes target redundancy gains to identify parallel searches, is currently one of the promising approaches for this distinction. Despite being proposed five decades ago, this method has not gained widespread acceptance among researchers in visual search area, potentially due to two limitations. One is its inability to reliably detect redundancy gains in established parallel searches (e.g., the distinct popout color search). The other is the presence of redundancy gains in pure-target-absent trials, which is apparently incompatible with the MTS 's explanation of redundancy gains. In this study, we tested a modified version of the traditional reaction-time-based MTS (rt-MTS) by developing an accuracy-based MTS (acc-MTS). The results suggested that the acc-MTS successfully overcomes the aforementioned limitations of the rt-MTS paradigm while maintaining significantly greater efficiency. These findings established the acc-MTS as a reliable and efficient methodological advancement for determining the serial or parallel nature of visual search tasks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zheng et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af541fad7bf08b1eadb8fdhttps://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251375982
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search1993 · 273 citations
  2. 2Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments2015 · 81 citations
  3. 3Multidimensional same–different judgments: Evidence against independent comparisons of dimensions.1978 · 38 citations
  4. 4Start time affects the mode of color search: Evidence for a short-lived capacity-limited parallel process in visual search.2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Multiple visual items can be simultaneously compared with target templates in memory2024 · 3 citations