PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 17, 2025International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research0 citationsOpen Access

Democratic Aesthetics and Cultural Diplomacy between India and Europe: Tracing the Role of Art and Culture as Soft Power in Shaping their Political Thought

View Full Paper
IIIshrita Ishrita

Key Points

  • Artistic exchange fosters democratic values in both India and Europe, impacting political thought and civic participation.
  • Cultural diplomacy serves as a form of soft power, showcasing the mutual influence of art and culture across regions.
  • This comparative-historical analysis utilizes Jürgen Habermas’s theory to explore the public sphere and collective values.
  • Cultural institutions play a pivotal role in mediating dominant discourses through aesthetic traditions and cultural defiance.

Abstract

The dynamic relation between art, culture, and political values has significantly influenced the trajectories of democratic governance as a political language in both India and Europe. From India’s anti-colonial aesthetic traditions to Europe’s post-war reflections on decolonisation and participatory democracy, cultural forms have offered domains for reaffirming democratic ethos. This paper examines artistic exchange and cultural diplomacy as significant forms of soft power that shape political thought and foster democratic values across both regions. This study highlights the mutual influence of cultural exchange in voicing civic participation and its potential to reinvigorate democratic values in a disjointed political landscape. Building on Jürgen Habermas’s theory of the “public sphere”, the study examines how cultural arenas serve as domains for debate, deliberation, and the manifestation of collective values. By employing a comparative-historical approach, the paper traces the cross-cultural impact of Enlightenment ethos on Reformist movements in India and likewise how India & anti-colonial aesthetic traditions influenced post-war reflections on decolonisation and participatory democracy in Europe. It further utilises Antonio Gramsci’s concept of “cultural hegemony” to analyse how both regions have mediated dominant discourses through aesthetic dissent and cultural defiance. The paper will also examine the role of institutions, such as cultural councils, international biennales, and academic exchanges, through the lens of Martha Nussbaum’s “capabilities approach”.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ishrita Ishrita (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af55c6ad7bf08b1eadbd2chttps://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.53932
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Indian Cultural Diplomacy And Soft Power In The Late Colonial Period: Intellectual Networks, Institutions, And Global2026
  2. 2Influence of India's Cultural Diplomacy on the International Order2026
  3. 3Brushstrokes of Diplomacy: Where Art Meets International Relations Theory2025
  4. 4Beyond Soft Power: Dharma, Civilisational Memory and India’s Buddhist Engagement with Southeast Asia2026
  5. 5India's Soft Power Diplomacy: Strengthening Global Partnerships for a New World Order2025