PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 21, 2025Advanced Functional Materials7 citations

Mechano‐Electrochemical and Structural Insights into Composition‐Driven Behavior of LiNi1‐x‐yCoxMnyO2 (0.3 < 1‐x‐y ≤ 0.8) Cathodes in Sulfide‐Based All‐Solid‐State Batteries

View Full Paper
JPJ.-G. ParkKKKanghyeon KimSLSeunghyun Lee

Key Points

  • Lower-Ni NCMs demonstrated poorer electrochemical performance despite their structural stability.
  • Interfacial decomposition of the sulfide electrolyte LPSCl was identified as the main degradation pathway.
  • Lattice volume changes and chemical reactivity largely dictate performance under high-pressure conditions.
  • Tailored interfacial engineering based on NCM composition is essential for optimizing ASSB performance.

Abstract

Abstract Sulfide‐based all‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) offer enhanced safety and high energy density but face challenges from mechano‐electrochemical degradation at the cathode–electrolyte interface. This study systematically investigates the composition‐dependent interfacial behavior of layered LiNi 1–x–y Co x Mn y O 2 (NCM) cathodes – NCM811, NCM523, and NCM111 – in contact with the sulfide electrolyte Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSCl). Two primary degradation pathways are considered: (i) lattice volume changes in NCM during cycling and (ii) electrochemical decomposition of LPSCl at the interface. Surprisingly, lower‐Ni NCMs, despite exhibiting smaller volume changes and higher structural stability, show inferior electrochemical performance compared to higher‐Ni NCMs under high‐pressure conditions. Comprehensive electrochemical and spectroscopic analyses reveal that interfacial decomposition of LPSCl is the dominant degradation route, increasing in severity with lower Ni content. Furthermore, in situ high‐temperature X‐ray diffraction demonstrates that contact with LPSCl induces comparable structural instability and oxygen release in delithiated NCMs, irrespective of their composition. These findings underscore that the principal limitation of LiNi 1‐x‐y Co x Mn y O 2 (0.3 < 1‐x‐y ≤ 0.8) in sulfide‐based ASSBs under high‐pressure conditions arises from the interfacial chemical reactivity between LPSCl and NCM, which is strongly governed by transition metal composition. Tailored interfacial engineering based on NCM composition is therefore essential for the development of high‐performance sulfide‐based ASSBs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af56f4ad7bf08b1eadcf4dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202517263
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper