PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 21, 2025Journal of High Energy Physics0 citationsOpen Access

Comparing top-down and bottom-up holographic defects and boundaries

View Full Paper
WHWilliam R. HarveyKJKristan JensenTUTakahiro Uzu

Key Points

  • Top-down and bottom-up holographic approaches yield significant differences in modeling conformal defects and boundaries.
  • Boundary correlation functions reveal a fundamental analogue to a bulk point singularity in the analysis of defects.
  • Using AdS/CFT, we compute properties like the central charge b for various boundary CFT setups, focusing on their intricate models.
  • Findings suggest conditions under which one can approximate D3/D5 boundary CFT with specific brane configurations.

Abstract

A bstract In this work we consider domain walls and end-of-the-world branes in AdS/CFT, holographically dual to codimension-one conformal defects and conformal boundaries respectively. In this setting there is an analogue of the “bulk point” singularity in boundary correlation functions, which we use to compare top-down and bottom-up constructions of these systems. For example, for a range of parameters the D3/D5 boundary CFT cannot be imitated by a tensionful end-of-the-world brane coupled to Einstein gravity, and in another range it can be modeled with a negative tension brane. Along the way we compute the central charge b for the M2/M5 boundary CFT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harvey et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af56faad7bf08b1eadd44ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/jhep08(2025)167
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper