PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 15, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Guardians of the Pledge: Justice for Minorities in Islam and International Law

View Full Paper
ZBZainab Bibi

Key Points

  • The study highlights minority rights in Islamic governance and international law, demonstrating their importance for religious freedom.
  • Key documents like the Qur’an and Universal Declaration of Human Rights shape protections for minorities through a shared commitment to justice.
  • This analysis employs a comparative approach, exploring how historical precedents inform modern understandings of minority rights.
  • Recognizing the ethical principles in both systems can strengthen global efforts to protect minority rights and ensure equality.

Abstract

The protection of minority rights is a cornerstone of both Islamic governance and modern international human rights law, though the philosophical foundations and legal mechanisms differ. This study, examines the principles, historical precedents, and contemporary frameworks safeguarding the rights of non-Muslims. From an Islamic perspective, the Qur’an, Sunnah, and covenants established by the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) affirm justice, equality, and protection for all communities under Muslim rule. Historical examples, including the Charter of Madinah and subsequent treaties, demonstrate a commitment to religious freedom, security of life and property, and social participation for minorities. In parallel, contemporary international law is enshrined in instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) sets global standards for the protection of minority groups, emphasizing non-discrimination, cultural preservation, and equal access to resources. Through a comparative analysis, this research highlights areas of convergence, such as the right to life, property, and religious freedom, alongside divergences rooted in differing legal traditions and interpretative frameworks. While Islamic provisions derive authority from divine revelation and historical practice, international law operates within a secular, consensus-based order. The paper concludes that meaningful dialogue between these systems can strengthen global commitments to minority rights. Recognizing the shared ethical principles and bridging interpretive gaps can pave the way for a more inclusive and universally respected framework for justice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zainab Bibi (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af5bafad7bf08b1eadef79https://doi.org/10.63878/qrjs266
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Protection of Minorities under Islamic Jurisprudence2024
  2. 2Treatment of Non-Muslim Minorities in Islamic Nations: Prophetic Principles2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Islam and human rights in the Muslim World: Essentialist and socio-historical perspectives2025
  4. 4In the explanatory religion of Islam and human rights (citizenship rights)2025
  5. 5In the explanatory religion of Islam and human rights (citizenship rights)2025