PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2025Journal of Student Research0 citationsOpen Access

The Ethical Considerations of Brain-Computer Interfaces

View Full Paper
OGOndine Goedhuis

Key Points

  • Brain-computer interfaces can restore autonomy and personhood in individuals with disabilities, and may redefine their interaction with the world.
  • The potential for BCIs to enhance capabilities beyond natural functions raises ethical dilemmas regarding personhood and moral responsibility.
  • As an emerging biotechnology, BCIs present a mix of benefits and threats to legal and social norms, particularly around human dignity.
  • This work argues that while BCIs can empower users, they also risk undermining human rights if misused for enhancement.

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) were developed in the late 20th century as computer systems that use inputs from brain signals to command a device in the user’s external environment. BCI technology may have a powerful impact on the lives of individuals with disabilities that inhibit their movement or communication; users have the opportunity to interact with their physical environment and community through these assistive devices. However, as BCIs emerge as revolutionary tools in biotechnology, they raise an onslaught of ethical considerations. This paper addresses the potential benefits and harms of BCI using the work of Immanuel Kant and Francis Fukuyama as primary guiding philosophical theories. This paper analyzes how BCIs can restore personhood and autonomy in those with disabilities that hinder their connection to their bodies. Simultaneously, this paper discusses how BCIs may undermine personhood and autonomy if enhancing the user’s capabilities past natural human function. This paper analyzes how BCIs used for enhancement purposes may affect perceptions of legal and moral responsibility, boundaries on normality, and the foundations of human nature and dignity. This paper argues that while BCIs have the therapeutic potential to bring those with disabilities closer in touch with their humanity, they threaten to undermine the human rights and dignity essential to a functioning society if used extensively for enhancement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ondine Goedhuis (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af5f0dad7bf08b1eae1a79https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8906
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Understanding the Ethical Issues of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs): A Blessing or the Beginning of a Dystopian Future?2024 · 38 citations
  2. 2Brain-computer interfaces: Transforming healthcare and navigating ethical boundaries2026
  3. 3Brain-computer interfaces: A lifeline for paralysis or a Pandora's box for humanity?2026
  4. 4The Ways BCIs can be Abused and The Necessary Preventative Actions2024
  5. 5Mind over Machine: Ethical Dilemmas in Brain–computer Interface Technology2024