PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 26, 2025Journal of Marine Science and Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

An Engineering Method for Structural Analysis of Semisubmersible Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Substructures

View Full Paper
VRVictor RappeKHKris HectorsMOMuk Chen Ong

Key Points

  • The proposed method accurately maps loads onto a finite element model, crucial for understanding structural integrity.
  • Results indicate the highest stresses occur at key structural points, remaining below the yield strength of steel.
  • Utilizing a hybrid dynamic analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of various environmental loads.
  • The method's effectiveness was validated against dynamic simulations, supporting its practical application in offshore engineering.

Abstract

This work proposes a mid-fidelity load-mapping method for the structural analysis of semisubmersible floating offshore wind turbine substructures. Building on a hybrid linear potential flow and strip-theory dynamic analysis, the method maps hydrodynamic, current, hydrostatic, gravitational, inertial, mooring, and turbine loads onto a shell-based finite element (FE) model. The functionality of the proposed method is demonstrated through two case studies involving ultimate limit state analysis of a structurally reinforced OC4 DeepCwind semisubmersible platform. The analyses were conducted for two design load cases (DLCs) formulated to represent the metocean conditions at the Utsira Nord site, located off the coast of Norway. The accuracy of the mapped hydrostatic and potential flow loads is validated against dynamic simulation data, while a mesh convergence study is used to ensure reliable FE model performance. Results show that the highest von Mises stresses occur at unsupported heave-plate regions, internal stiffeners, and welded joints, with peak stresses safely below the steel’s yield strength. The more severe conditions of DLC 6.1 lead to a broader distribution of high-stress locations compared to DLC 1.6 but only a modest increase in peak stress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rappe et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af63ddad7bf08b1eae3e9chttps://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091630
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Time-domain fatigue reliability analysis for floating offshore wind turbine substructures using coupled nonlinear aero-hydro-servo-elastic simulations2024 · 39 citations
  2. 2Performance study of the QuLAF pre-design model for a 10 MW floating wind turbine2019 · 11 citations
  3. 3A novel two-way coupled algorithm of time-domain hydro-elastic analysis for free-end offshore floating structures using inertia relief method2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4Time domain analysis procedures for fatigue assessment of a semi-submersible wind turbine2014 · 124 citations
  5. 5Dynamics Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine2007 · 957 citations