PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 20251 citations

Digital Resilience and Financial Stability: Rethinking the Strategic Role of FinTech, AI, and CBDC in Indonesia and Emerging Economies

View Full Paper
WPWiwiek PrihandiniSSSiti Safaria

Key Points

  • FinTech enhances financial inclusion while AI improves predictive supervision and CBDC ensures better monetary control.
  • Risks like regulatory fragmentation and digital inequality arise if innovations outpace regulatory frameworks.
  • Proposed policy recommendations emphasize digital financial resilience strategies and ethical AI frameworks for sustainable growth.
  • Indonesia serves as a model for integrating digital innovation with robust governance and institutional strategies.

Abstract

In the era of accelerating digital transformation, financial systems in emerging economies face a dual challenge: harnessing the potential of innovation while safeguarding systemic stability. This paper examines the strategic role of Financial Technology (FinTech), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) in enhancing financial resilience and ensuring macroprudential stability, with a particular focus on Indonesia as a leading example of digital financial integration in the Global South. Drawing on comparative policy analysis, global regulatory trends, and Indonesia's policy innovations—such as the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS), Bank Indonesia’s Garuda Project, and the Financial Services Authority’s (OJK) regulatory sandbox—this study proposes an integrative framework that links digital innovation with governance architecture and institutional readiness. The findings reveal that while FinTech accelerates inclusion, AI enhances predictive supervision, and CBDCs improve monetary control, their effectiveness depends on adaptive regulation, cross-sectoral coordination, and data governance. The paper also highlights the risks of regulatory fragmentation, algorithmic bias, and digital inequality if innovations outpace institutional preparedness. In response, the study outlines policy recommendations centered on principle-based supervision, digital financial resilience strategies, and ethical frameworks for AI and CBDC. Theoretically, this research contributes to the evolving discourse on digital-era macroprudential governance; practically, it offers a roadmap for policymakers to build robust, inclusive, and sovereign financial ecosystems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Prihandini et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb3d682b87ece8dc956903https://doi.org/10.56174/jbfb.v1i1.970
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Regulating Fintech in the CBDC Era: Addressing Competitive Fragility and Preserving State-Owned Banking Stability2025
  2. 2LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN THE DIGITAL BANKING SECTOR2024
  3. 3Opportunities and Challenges of Digitalization in Islamic Banking in Improving Customer Service Quality2024
  4. 4Digital transformation in the financial system: A comprehensive review of the literature on fintech and financial inclusion2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Financial Digitalization in Indonesia: Analysis of Fintech's Role in Promoting Financial Inclusion through Literature Study2025