PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science2 citations

Exploring the Impact of Autocratic Leadership Style on Student Performance: Evidence from Higher Education Lecturers in Cambodia

View Full Paper
PHP. HollDADhakir Abbas Ali

Key Points

  • A significant positive relationship exists between autocratic leadership and student performance, enhancing academic outcomes.
  • Autocratic leadership accounts for 14.1% of the variance in student performance, highlighting a notable influence.
  • The study employs a quantitative cross-sectional survey design, targeting 305 lecturers to measure leadership behaviors.
  • While fostering structure, the study notes limitations of autocratic leadership in promoting creativity and collaboration.

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of autocratic leadership style on student performance in Cambodian public universities. In a context where hierarchical governance structures and centralized control are prominent, understanding the effects of leadership styles is critical for institutional development and academic success. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey design was employed, targeting 305 full-time and part-time lecturers across selected institutions. A structured questionnaire measured autocratic leadership behaviors and perceived student performance outcomes, including skill development, cognitive engagement, and retention. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) confirmed the construct validity of the measurement instruments, while Cronbach’s alpha values (α = 0.841 for leadership and α = 0.973 for student performance) indicated strong internal reliability. A simple linear regression analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between autocratic leadership and student performance (B = 0.530, p < 0.001), with an R² of 0.141, suggesting that autocratic leadership accounts for 14.1% of the variance in student outcomes. These findings suggest that within Cambodia’s bureaucratically driven educational environment, autocratic leadership may foster structure and compliance conducive to academic discipline. However, the study also recognizes the limitations of this leadership style in promoting creativity, collaboration, and long-term institutional innovation. The research contributes to the limited empirical literature on leadership in developing countries and offers practical implications for higher education governance in Cambodia. It recommends further investigation into alternative leadership styles and expanded methodological approaches, including qualitative and longitudinal analyses, to fully understand leadership’s multifaceted impact on student success.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Holl et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb3d682b87ece8dc9569afhttps://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.908000064
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper