PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025JACC Advances2 citationsOpen Access

Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients With Preserved LVEF

View Full Paper
TNTasneem Z. NaqviSLShuang LiuOWOral Waldo

Key Points

  • Chronic right ventricular apical pacing of ≥50% worsens left ventricular systolic function over time.
  • Patients with ≥50% pacing burden had a median drop in left ventricular ejection fraction of 6%, highlighting significant impact.
  • Mechanical dyssynchrony and other factors were significant predictors of heart failure hospitalization and mortality.
  • This study involved a retrospective review of medical records from 459 patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Abstract

Long-term adverse cardiac effects of right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients with normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) are not well studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate adverse effects of RV apical pacing in patients with normal LVEF. Medical records of patients who had undergone RV apical pacemaker implantation for pacing indications and had an LVEF ≥50% were reviewed to determine the effect of RV pacing burden on LV systolic and diastolic function, mechanical dyssynchrony, heart failure hospitalization (HFH), and all-cause mortality. Of the 875 eligible patients from a single center, 459 patients met the inclusion criteria, 185 had 10% LVEF (HR: 1.73 95% CI:1.09-2.75), baseline E/e' ratio (HR: 1.07 95% CI: 1.05-1.11; P < 0.0001), and LV mechanical dyssynchrony by strain imaging performed in 193 subjects (HR: 1.031 95% CI: 1.012-1.051; P < 0.001) were predictors of HFH. Baseline mechanical dyssynchrony (HR: 1.024 95% CI: 1.008-1.04; P < 0.01), its worsening by 25% (HR: 2.077 95% CI: 1.109-3.89; P < 0.03), and baseline E/e' (HR: 1.063 95% CI: 1.025-1.10; P < 0.01) were predictors of all-cause mortality. In patients with normal baseline LVEF, chronic apical RV pacing of ≥50% is associated with worse LV systolic function, LV mechanical dyssynchrony, and increases HFH.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Naqvi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb3d682b87ece8dc956ad7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper