PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025Terapevticheskii arkhiv0 citationsOpen Access

Experience in the application of ultrasound indices for assessing the activity of inflammatory bowel diseases

View Full Paper
DMD. D. MUKHAMETOVAIMIlyas M. MinnemullinOAOlga E. Akchurina

Key Points

  • Active ulcerative colitis shows significantly higher bowel wall thickness than remission, highlighting the utility of ultrasound.
  • In assessing active ulcerative colitis, a bowel wall thickness above 3 mm yields a sensitivity of 90.5% and specificity of 70.6%.
  • Utilizing the Milan Ultrasound Criteria, significant differences in scores between exacerbation and remission phases were observed.
  • Ultrasound imaging demonstrates effective capability in differentiating active inflammatory bowel disease states, supporting its clinical use.

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US) parameters and indices for assessing the active inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Materials and methods. The study included 115 patients with IBD, 41 (36%) patients were with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 74 (64%) – with Crohn's disease (CD). Transabdominal US examination of the intestine was performed on Sonoscape S2N, with a bowel wall thickness (BWT) of 3 mm considered the norm. To assess activity in UC, the Milan Ultrasound Criteria (MUC) score was used, and in CD – International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS). Results. In active UC BWT (5.91 4.87; 6.95 mm) was greater than in remission (2.9 2.6; 3.1 mm; p = 0.003). For active UC diagnosis BWT greater than 3 mm had sensitivity (Se) of 90.5% and specificity (Sp) of 70.6%. The MUC in exacerbation (9 7.88; 11.8) was higher than in remission (4.2 3.64; 4.9; p 0.001). In 31 (89%) patients in exacerbation, the MUC was higher than 6.2 (Se 88.9%, Sp 87.5%), and in 34 (97%) at a threshold of 5.18 (Se 96.3%, Sp 87.5%). In active CD, BWT (4.9 3.8; 6.6 mm) was greater than in remission (3.18 2.6; 3.5; p = 0.0001), with Se 87.0%, Sp 71.4%. The IBUS-SAS in active CD (46.8 27; 71.5) was higher than the remission (12.6 11.2; 30.2; p = 0.001). At a threshold of 37.5, the IBUS-SAS had Se 92.6%, Sp 61.5%, and at 45.2, Se 92.6%, Sp 87.2%. Conclusion. US imaging is a useful and effective tool for assessing IBD activity; a threshold value of the MUC score of 5.18 and IBUS-SAS of 45.2 suggests better diagnostic value for differentiating between exacerbation and remission.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

MUKHAMETOVA et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb3ee82b87ece8dc9570b4https://doi.org/10.26442/00403660.2025.08.203303
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1P0340Non-Invasive Precision Assessment in Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison of MUC and IBUS-SAS Against Endoscopic Activity2026
  2. 2Plasma <scp>Immunoglobulin A</scp> and intestinal ultrasound: Novel indicators for disease activity monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease—Insights from a Taiwan cohort2026
  3. 3P0272Usefulness of bowel wall thickness and Milan ultrasound criteria in defining endoscopically active disease in Nepalese patients with ulcerative colitis2026
  4. 4A225 ASSESSMENT OF BEDSIDE INTESTINAL ULTRASOUND IN MONITORING CROHN’S DISEASE ACTIVITY2024
  5. 5Quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging for the evaluation of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease2024 · 6 citations