PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025Physical review. D/Physical review. D.1 citationsOpen Access

Constraining cosmology with N -body simulations for future spectroscopic galaxy surveys at 2≤z≤3

View Full Paper
SPSy-Yun PuTOTeppei OkumuraCCChian-Chou Chen

Key Points

  • We achieve constraints of a few percent on geometric distances and structure growth in the distant universe.
  • The study identifies clear features of baryon acoustic oscillations and redshift-space distortions in halo catalogs.
  • Constraints on the Hubble constant and spatial curvature are achievable at minimal values via future spectroscopic surveys.
  • Our forecast suggests effective use of high-density galaxy samples for enhancing cosmological measurements.

Abstract

Determining the spatial curvature (₊) independent of cosmic microwave background observations plays a key role in revealing the physics of the early Universe. The Hubble tension is one of the most serious issues in modern cosmology. We investigate halo catalogs identified from N-body simulations at z=2 and 3, mimicking high-redshift galaxy surveys. We measure redshift-space correlation functions of halos from the two snapshots. We detect clear features of baryon acoustic oscillations and redshift-space distortions. We find that we can obtain a few percent constraints on both the geometric distances and growth of structure at the distant universe in future surveys. By taking into account the information of the underlying matter power spectrum, we demonstrate that we can also achieve constraint on the Hubble constant H₀ with a few percent as well as the spatial curvature with |₊|0. 1 by observing galaxies with the number density with n₆10^-4 (h^3 Mpc^-3). Our analysis provides a timely forecast for the upcoming spectroscopic surveys, which target emission line galaxy or dusty star-forming galaxy samples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb3ef02b87ece8dc95746dhttps://doi.org/10.1103/n9cp-vkz7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Constraints on the Hubble and Matter Density Parameters with and Without Modelling the CMB Anisotropies2025
  2. 2Raising the bar: new constraints on the Hubble parameter with cosmic chronometers at <i>z</i> ∼ 22015 · 1,028 citations
  3. 3A model-independent treatment of cosmic ladder calibration and $\Omega_k$ measurement through low-$z$ observations2024
  4. 4Revisiting model-independent constraints on spatial curvature and cosmic ladders calibration: updated and forecast analyses2026 · 7 citations
  5. 5Model-independent Way to Determine the Hubble Constant and the Curvature from the Phase Shift of Gravitational Waves with DECIGO2024 · 13 citations