PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025Computational Intelligence0 citationsOpen Access

Retraction

View Full Paper

Key Points

  • The article was retracted due to a compromised peer review process, affecting its validity.
  • All parties, including the editor-in-chief, agreed on the need for retraction after an investigation.
  • The retraction highlights the importance of maintaining integrity in scholarly publishing and peer review.
  • This case emphasizes that thorough review processes are essential for valid scientific discourse.

Abstract

ABSTRACT RETRACTION : P. Kirubanantham , G. Vijayakumar , “,” Computational Intelligence 36 no. ( 2020 ): 1063 – 1077 , https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12309 . The above article, published online on 17 March 2020 in Wiley Online Library ( wileyonlinelibrary.com ) has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor‐in‐Chief, Diana Inkpen; and Wiley Periodicals LLC. The article was published as part of a guest‐edited issue. Following an investigation by the publisher, all parties have concluded that this article was accepted solely on the basis of a compromised peer review process. The editors have therefore decided to retract the article. The authors have been informed of the retraction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 2025 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb3ef72b87ece8dc9579c6https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.70115
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Retraction2025
  2. 2Retraction2025
  3. 3Retraction2025
  4. 4Retraction2025
  5. 5Retraction2025