PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025Small18 citationsOpen Access

3D Conjugated Nonflat Biphenyl Side Chains: Their Exclusive Role in Inducing Negative Electrostatic Potential in Efficient Organic Solar Cells

View Full Paper
SJSeonghun JeongZSZhe SunYCYongjoon Cho

Key Points

  • Enhanced PCE of 19.23% in BPY-based OSCs due to minimized energy loss.
  • Study shows improved intermolecular interactions and negative electrostatic potential with biphenyl chains.
  • Introduction of biphenyl chains effectively reduces nonradiative energy loss in organic solar cells.
  • Findings provide new material strategies to optimize energy efficiency in nonfullerene acceptor OSCs.

Abstract

Abstract In nonfullerene acceptor (NFA) (so‐called Y‐series)‐based organic solar cells (OSCs), reducing energy loss, particularly nonradiative energy loss, is critical for achieving high power conversion efficiency (PCE). However, at present, molecular design strategies for controlling and/or optimizing energy loss involve multiple complexities. Therefore, this study demonstrates that the introduction of simple, 3D conjugated nonflat biphenyl side chains into a Y‐series NFA (yielding BPY) can improve high dipole moments‐induced intermolecular interactions and negatively charged surface electrostatic potential driven by partially isolated negative charges. When BPY is blended with a PM6 donor, the resulting BPY‐based OSC exceeds that of the control Y6‐based OSC. This result is attributed to the minimized nonradiative energy loss via weakened π–π stacking and efficient charge dynamics. The addition of BPY to PM6:BTP‐eC9 blends yields ternary OSCs that exhibit a high PCE of 19.23% owing to significant improvements in both the open‐circuit voltage and fill factor. These findings not only highlight the influence of biphenyl side chains on the molecular properties of NFAs but also provide an effective material avenue to optimize nonradiative energy loss for high‐performance OSCs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jeong et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb42272b87ece8dc958cdehttps://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202509667
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dithienoquinoxalineimide‐Based Polymer Donor Enables All‐Polymer Solar Cells Over 19 % Efficiency2024 · 126 citations
  2. 2Insight Into Designing High‐Performance Polythiophenes for Reduced Urbach Energy and Nonradiative Recombination in Organic Solar Cells2024 · 48 citations
  3. 3Guest Acceptors with Lower Electrostatic Potential in Ternary Organic Solar Cells for Minimizing Voltage Losses2024 · 71 citations
  4. 4Recombination‐Limited Photocurrents in Low Bandgap Polymer/Fullerene Solar Cells2009 · 395 citations
  5. 5Influence of the dipole moment on the photovoltaic performance of polymer solar cells employing non-fullerene small molecule acceptor2021 · 36 citations