PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025Frontiers in Digital Health2 citationsOpen Access

Pathologists' user experience in the era of digital pathology: a KAP study in a region of emerging digitization

View Full Paper
MSMaher A. SughayerLSLina SouanJTJoud S. Tadros

Key Points

  • Most pathologists in Jordan (69.2%) have average or above-average knowledge of digital pathology and show interest in its use.
  • Significant barriers to adopting digital pathology include a lack of funds (76.9%) and inadequate infrastructure, while consultation is its primary use.
  • The study utilized a digital survey sent to 40 practicing pathologists across various sectors in Jordan to gather insights on their knowledge and attitudes.
  • Despite limited resources, the majority of pathologists are open to integrating digital pathology into their practices if challenges are addressed.

Abstract

Background Information regarding the use of digital pathology (DP) in developing countries is limited. Additionally, the knowledge and attitudes/perceptions of pathologists are mainly unknown. In this study, we aim to assess the knowledge and attitudes of Jordanian pathologists on DP and artificial intelligence (AI). Methods A digital survey consisting of 32 questions was constructed using Google Forms and sent to practicing pathologists across all sectors in Jordan. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Forty pathologists representing university hospitals, the Ministry of Health, the Royal Medical Services (RMS), and the private sector (PS) participated in the study. 69.2% of participants had average/above-average knowledge of DP. 77.8% of participants without scanners were interested in obtaining one if funds were available, and 85% were likely or very likely to use it for diagnostic purposes. In comparison, 92.5% were very likely to use it for consultation. Cases diagnosed using DP represent 10%. 85% of participants expressed interest in attending sessions at a national congress on DP, and 37.5% currently use AI platforms. Approximately 65% of people with DP didn't follow any guidelines. Seventy-one percent and twenty-nine percent of the guidelines used were from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP), respectively. At the same time, all pathologists believed the Jordanian Pathologists Society should develop its guidelines. 76.9% thought that a lack of funds was the primary obstacle to adopting DP. In comparison, a lack of infrastructure and experience ranked second, with 40% indicating a lack of interest or a preference for glass slides as obstacles. As for the primary use of DP, 86.8%, 73.7%, 63.2%, 50%, 44.7%, and 44.7% would use it for consultation, education, research, diagnosis, archiving cases, and tumor boards, respectively. Conclusions Although digital pathology and slide scanners are limited in Jordan, most pathologists are willing to adopt their use, provided that the significant challenges of a lack of funding and inadequate infrastructure are addressed. The primary uses of DP in Jordan seem to be related to consultations and research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sughayer et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb49c46d6d5674bccff7b3https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1603985
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinician Perspectives on Digital and Computational Pathology: Clinical Benefits, Concerns, and Willingness to Adopt2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Digital pathology: Barriers to transitioning to the digital age2026
  3. 3Guidelines for the adoption of digital pathology in clinical pathology units recommended by the polish society of pathologists2026
  4. 4Digital Pathology for Better Clinical Practice2024 · 26 citations
  5. 5Digital Pathology in Hematopathology: From Vision to Deployment2025