PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025Asian Studies0 citationsOpen Access

Beyond Duality

View Full Paper
PVPankaj Vaishnav

Key Points

  • Both Advaita Vedānta and Madhyamaka philosophically engage with the concept of nothingness, offering distinct paths to liberation.
  • Advaita Vedānta posits that Brahman is the sole reality, while Madhyamaka emphasizes the emptiness of all phenomena.
  • Shared principles between these traditions include critiques of ego-based delusion and the importance of wisdom for transformational insights.
  • Contextualizing these philosophies within their socio-cultural backgrounds showcases their relevance to contemporary existential issues.

Abstract

This article explores the concept of “nothingness” in the Advaita Vedānta and Madhyamaka traditions of Indian Buddhism, analysing their convergences, divergences, and broader implications within Indian philosophical traditions. Both systems emphasize the transcendence of duality and the limitations of ordinary perception in realizing ultimate truth. For Advaita Vedānta, Brahman—the singular, eternal essence—is the sole reality, with the phenomenal world regarded as an illusion (māyā). Liberation arises through self-realization, where one recognizes the unity of self (atman) and Brahman. Conversely, Madhyamaka Buddhism denies the existence of any inherent essence, positing emptiness (Śūnyatā) as the nature of all phenomena. Liberation in this framework involves the cessation of clinging and the realization of interdependence. The article contextualizes these philosophies within their socio-cultural milieus, revealing how their metaphysical claims respond to existential and ethical concerns. While Advaita seeks to unify diversity through non-dualism, Madhyamaka challenges rigid constructs, emphasizing relational existence. Comparative analysis highlights shared principles, such as the critique of ego-based delusion and the transformative power of wisdom, alongside distinct soteriological paths rooted in their metaphysical differences. By engaging with these traditions, the article not only underscores their philosophical richness, but also explores their relevance to contemporary issues, including existential anxiety and ethical dilemmas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pankaj Vaishnav (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb4d106d6d5674bcd005a4https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2025.13.3.213-243
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper