PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025Journal of the American Heart Association0 citationsOpen Access

Periprocedural assessment of coronary microcirculatory function to predict clinical outcomes after elective PCI

View Full Paper
CLChenguang LiYanbian UniversityYZYou ZhouFujian Medical UniversityDLDanbo LuShanghai Medical College of Fudan University

Key Points

  • Changes in angio-IMR predicted major adverse cardiac events in patients after elective PCI.
  • Median angio-IMR values significantly changed before and after PCI, indicating procedural impact.
  • Data from 1,768 stable coronary artery disease patients were analyzed over a median follow-up of 20 months.
  • Incorporating angio-IMR changes can improve identification of patients at high risk for adverse events.

Abstract

Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could restore epicardial blood flow through the stent‐based angioplasty. However, coronary microcirculatory function also impacts clinical outcomes and can be quantified by the angiography‐derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio‐IMR). The prognostic significance of periprocedural angio‐IMR in patients undergoing elective PCI remains unclear. This study aimed to assess angio‐IMR before and after PCI, as well as their association with long‐term prognosis. Methods Data from 1,768 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing elective PCI were analyzed. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) comprising death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Results The median angio‐IMR was 11.3 (interquartile range IQR, 7.7 ‐ 15.0) and 17.0 (IQR, 14.1 ‐ 20.4) before and after PCI (p 10 was independently associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 ‐ 4.49; p = 0.004). In comparison with periprocedural myocardial infarction, Δangio‐IMR > 10 could provide additional prognostic value in predicting MACE (area under the curve, 0.681 vs. 0.635, p < 0.05). Conclusions Δangio‐IMR was a predictor of MACE in patients with stable CAD undergoing elective PCI. Incorporating Δangio‐IMR could enhance the identification of patients at high risk of MACE.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb4e016d6d5674bcd02a5dhttps://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.043836
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease2007 · 4,720 citations
  2. 2The Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Predicts Myocardial Infarction Related to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention2012 · 78 citations
  3. 3Prognostic Value of Microvascular Resistance Reserve Measured Immediately After PCI in Stable Coronary Artery Disease2024 · 19 citations
  4. 4An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group2020 · 786 citations
  5. 5Endothelial Cell–Derived von Willebrand Factor Is the Major Determinant That Mediates von Willebrand Factor–Dependent Acute Ischemic Stroke by Promoting Postischemic Thrombo-Inflammation2016 · 64 citations