PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025Energies2 citationsOpen Access

Cascade Hydropower Plant Operational Dispatch Control Using Deep Reinforcement Learning on a Digital Twin Environment

View Full Paper
EWE WeissRGRobert GselmanRPRudi Polner

Key Points

  • The RL agent achieved an absolute mean error of 7.64 MW, similar to the human dispatcher's error of 5.8 MW.
  • Training an RL agent in a realistic digital twin environment enhances cascade hydropower operation efficiency.
  • This study employed algorithms like DDPG, TD3, SAC, and PPO to optimize flow control in hydropower systems.
  • Long-term decision-making analysis indicates potential benefits of AI integration into energy management.

Abstract

In this work, we propose the use of a reinforcement learning (RL) agent for the control of a cascade hydropower plant system. Generally, this job is handled by power plant dispatchers who manually adjust power plant electricity production to meet the changing demand set by energy traders. This work explores the more fundamental problem with the cascade hydropower plant operation of flow control for power production in a highly nonlinear setting on a data-based digital twin. Using deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG), twin delayed DDPG (TD3), soft actor-critic (SAC), and proximal policy optimization (PPO) algorithms, we can generalize the characteristics of the system and determine the human dispatcher level of control of the entire system of eight hydropower plants on the river Drava in Slovenia. The creation of an RL agent that makes decisions similar to a human dispatcher is not only interesting in terms of control but also in terms of long-term decision-making analysis in an ever-changing energy portfolio. The specific novelty of this work is in training an RL agent on an accurate testing environment of eight real-world cascade hydropower plants on the river Drava in Slovenia and comparing the agent’s performance to human dispatchers. The results show that the RL agent’s absolute mean error of 7.64 MW is comparable to the general human dispatcher’s absolute mean error of 5.8 MW at a peak installed power of 591.95 MW.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Weiss et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb5f3e6d6d5674bcd03396https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174660
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper