PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 20250 citationsOpen Access

The interplay of future emissions and geophysical uncertainties for future sea level rise

View Full Paper
CDChloe DarnellLRLisa RennelsFEFrank Errickson

Key Points

  • Neglecting negative emissions technologies, the emissions trajectory becomes the main driver of sea-level variability after 2075.
  • Accelerated melting of the Antarctic Ice Sheet significantly affects the sensitivity of global mean sea-level rise to cumulative emissions.
  • Delaying decarbonization reduces the 'safe operating space' in the context of geophysical uncertainties affecting sea-level projections.
  • Both adaptation and rapid decarbonization are essential to manage risks associated with future sea level rise.

Abstract

Uncertainty in future carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and the geophysical response to emissions drives variability in future sea-level rise (SLR). However, the relative contributions of emissions and geophysical dynamics (e.g. Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) tipping points) to future sea-level projections are not well understood. Here, we disentangle their relative importance by propagating an ensemble of CO2 emissions trajectories through a calibrated carbon cycle-climate-sea-level model chain. When neglecting negative emissions technologies (NETs), the CO2 emissions trajectory, particularly the timing of when emissions are reduced, becomes the primary driver of sea-level variability only after 2075. Accelerated AIS melting can greatly influence the transient sensitivity of GMSLR to cumulative emissions and warming. As a result of these path dependencies, delaying decarbonization reduces the “safe operating space” associated with the geophysical uncertainties. Our results highlight the importance of both adaptation and rapid decarbonization (including negative emissions) to manage the risks posed by SLR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Darnell et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb5f7a6d6d5674bcd03b41https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/j47ts_v3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper