PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Saudi Journal of Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Cancer Cachexia: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence, Outcomes, and Interventions

View Full Paper
DADr Sharique AhmadDWDaanyaal Wasim

Key Points

  • Cachexia prevalence in advanced cancer patients is significantly high at 49.2%, with lung and pancreatic cancers most affected.
  • The risk of mortality in cachexia patients increases by 41%, demonstrating its critical clinical implications.
  • Nutritional interventions alone lack effectiveness, while multimodal approaches enhance weight stabilization and quality of life.
  • Anamorelin shows moderate effectiveness in increasing lean body mass, but its impact on survival remains unclear.

Abstract

Background: Cancer cachexia, often referred to as cancer wasting, is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by involuntary weight loss, muscle wasting, and systemic inflammation. It affects up to 80% of patients with advanced malignancy and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Despite increasing recognition, it remains underdiagnosed and inadequately treated. Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prevalence, clinical consequences, and effectiveness of interventions for cancer cachexia across malignancies. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and meta-analyses reporting prevalence, outcomes, or interventions in adult cancer patients were included. Studies were pooled using a random-effects model. Primary outcomes were prevalence and overall survival; secondary outcomes included treatment tolerance, quality of life, and intervention efficacy. Results: Forty-eight studies comprising 23,400 patients were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of cachexia was 49.2% (95% CI 43.1–54.8), highest in pancreatic (74%) and lung cancer (63%) populations. Cachexia was associated with a 41% higher risk of mortality (HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.23–1.61) and reduced chemotherapy tolerance (RR 1.38). Nutritional interventions alone were insufficient, whereas multimodal approaches (nutrition, pharmacologic agents, exercise) improved weight stabilization and quality of life. Anamorelin drug showed moderate efficacy in increasing lean body mass, though survival benefit remained unproven. Conclusion: Cancer cachexia is highly prevalent and clinically significant, yet interventions remain suboptimal. Early identification and multimodal treatment should be integrated into oncology practice. Future research must focus on biomarkers, standardization of diagnostic criteria, and novel therapeutic targets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ahmad et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c183f89b7b07f3a060fe01https://doi.org/10.36348/sjm.2025.v10i08.009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper