PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 20250 citations

Biofeedback and Neurofeedback in the Clinical Setting: A Review of Their Application and Ef-ficacy in Neurological and Psychiatric Condi-tions

View Full Paper
DMDaniel MeloAMAlexandre de MendonçaFSFernanda C. Dos Santos

Key Points

  • Robust evidence supports peripheral biofeedback in migraine management and neurofeedback for refractory epilepsy.
  • Heart Rate Variability biofeedback shows strong efficacy for anxiety and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
  • Theta/beta neurofeedback for ADHD faces significant methodological issues regarding its efficacy.
  • A paradigm shift towards precision medicine is needed to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of biofeedback and neurofeedback.

Abstract

Abstract: Neurological and psychiatric disorders frequently present with treatment-refractory symptoms, creating a significant demand for effective non-pharmacological interventions. Biofeedback and neurofeedback have emerged as prominent modalities, yet their utility remains contentious due to a landscape of varied protocols and conflicting research findings. This review aims to provide a critical, evidence-based synthesis of their application and efficacy to guide clinical decision-making. The methodology involved a search of high-level evidence, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, from the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library prioritizing publications from the last 15 years. The results indicate a robust evidence base for peripheral biofeedback in migraine management and for sensorimotor rhythm and slow cortical potential (SCP) neurofeedback in refractory epilepsy, with the latter demonstrating remarkable long-term durability. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) biofeedback shows strong efficacy for anxiety and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). In contrast, the evidence for theta/beta neurofeedback in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is highly contested due to fundamental methodological issues with rater blinding, and frontal alpha asymmetry neurofeedback for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is undermined by a significant replication crisis concerning its foundational biomarker. It is concluded that while biofeedback and neurofeedback provide solid, evidence-based interventions for select conditions, the broader field is hampered by a lack of protocol standardization and significant methodological challenges. The future of these therapies is contingent on a paradigm shift towards a precision-medicine model, leveraging rigorous research to identify predictive biomarkers and determine for whom these therapies are most effective

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Melo et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c189ca9b7b07f3a0612ff5https://doi.org/10.70164/ihsr.v1i4.39
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper