PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Standards0 citationsOpen Access

Leadership Discourse and Sustainability Reporting in Fast Fashion: A Longitudinal Topic Modelling and KPI Analysis

View Full Paper
JMJulia Marques de MedeirosADAna Clara Waisenberg DicezareABAna Carolina Bertassini

Key Points

  • Gradual evolution in leadership narratives reflects changing priorities in sustainability reporting, emphasizing climate action.
  • Key performance indicators show tensions between declared sustainability objectives and actual measurable outcomes.
  • Topic modelling of six years of reports highlights dominant themes in leadership communication about sustainability.
  • Research underscores the need for alignment between leadership discourse and consistent performance data to enhance credibility.

Abstract

Corporate sustainability reporting is increasingly scrutinised as stakeholders’ demand credible commitments to environmental and social performance, especially in sectors where unsustainable practices are pervasive. The aim of this research is to examine—drawing on a systematic literature review (SLR) of 48 articles—how leadership discourse in sustainability reports influences stakeholder engagement and reflects the adoption of sustainable development standards over time. A longitudinal analysis of six years (2018–2023) of sustainability reports from a leading fast fashion company was conducted, integrating Topic Modelling to identify dominant themes in leadership communication and comparing them with key performance indicators related to climate, materials, energy, water, waste, and packaging. The results reveal a gradual evolution in leadership narratives, from broad aspirational statements emphasising ethical supply chains and social justice to more technical, performance-oriented language highlighting circularity, operational transparency, and climate action. However, the analysis also uncovers inconsistencies between declared objectives and measurable outcomes, suggesting tensions between symbolic and substantive sustainability commitments. These findings indicate that, while leadership discourse can mobilise stakeholder expectations and signal strategic priorities, its credibility depends on alignment with transparent, consistent performance data. This study contributes to understanding how discourse and practice interact in sustainability transitions, offering insights for enhancing reporting integrity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Medeiros et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c189d99b7b07f3a06135efhttps://doi.org/10.3390/standards5030022
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper