PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025The Bukak History Academy0 citations

A Study on the Battle of Sokham Fortressand Military Mobilization during the Reign of King Jinpyeong of Silla

View Full Paper
DJDuk-gi Jung

Key Points

  • Silla's military mobilization during the Sokham Fortress battle led to weakened defenses against Baekje.
  • The commanders' withdrawal without engaging in battle highlights issues in military decision-making.
  • Construction of fortresses occurred, including Nojin Fortress, but did not compensate for low combat capabilities.
  • The battle's outcome contributed to the restructuring of military systems in Silla, specifically concerning the beopdang units.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the battlefield and progress of the Sokham Fortress battle during the reign of King Jinpyeong of Silla. It also examines Silla’s military mobilization for rescue operations. The battle occurred in the Hamyang region, unfolding in four phases: beginning in western Hamyang (Gijam Fortress), proceeding to Hamyang-eup (Sokham Fortress), and concluding at northern Hamyang (Aengjam Fortress). This battle was one of the three major battles between 554 and 642, representing the largest in scale. Silla dispatched five military units, consisting of two jujeongs(州停) and three dangs(幢) as reinforcement troops. However, the commanders of these units exaggerated the damage from losing their armies and withdrew without engaging in a sing battle. Instead, they constructed six fortresses, including Nojin Fortress. These units were part of Silla’s military strength in 624, and their puzzling decision-making can be related to the low combat capability of the beopdang(法幢) units. Due to the commanders’ decisions, Amak Fortress, Silla’s frontline defense against Baekje, fell without attack(不攻拔城), consequently falling under Baekje’s influence. Furthermore, Sokham Fortress, which served as the command center for frontline defense, was also surrendered to Baekje. As a result, Silla was placed in a defensive position in subsequent conflicts against Baekje. It is presumed that issues concerning the low combat capability of the beopdang were raised during the post-battle settlement process. This situation led to the restructuring of military systems, including nandang(郎幢), and contributed to the decline of the beopdang.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Duk-gi Jung (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a26954b1d3bfb60dd843https://doi.org/10.37288/bukak.2025.22.1.81
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Study on the Battle of Sokham Fortressand Military Mobilization during the Reign of King Jinpyeong of Silla2025
  2. 2Okcheon Iseongsansung Fortress of Study on the Peripheral Relics and Geopolitical Location2024
  3. 3Rediscussion on the Location of the Maeso-seong Fortress and the Fact of the Maeso-seong Fortress Warfare in the Period of the War between Silla and T’ang2024
  4. 4Rediscussion on the Location of the Maeso-seong Fortress and the Fact of the Maeso-seong Fortress Warfare in the Period of the War between Silla and T’ang2024
  5. 5Workers and Stonemason in Stone Fortress Construction of the Silla based on Pre-Modern Fortress Building Documents2025