PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Journal of ICT Research and Applications4 citationsOpen Access

Smart Campus Framework: Definition, Model, Measurement from Anthropocentric, Systemic and Technological Perspectives

View Full Paper
RIRadiant Victor ImbarSSSuhono Harso SupangkatALArmein Z. R. Langi

Key Points

  • The developed framework effectively measures smart campus levels among higher education institutions.
  • Reliability testing showed a strong Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.883, validating the measurement model's reliability.
  • Anthropocentric smartness levels across ten campuses were primarily rated at levels 3 and 4, whereas systemic and technological smartness were at level 2.
  • Expert validation from 10 specialists confirmed the framework's relevance to current campus conditions and needs.

Abstract

This study developed a smart campus framework to help higher education institutions (HEIs) define and assess their smartness level. As HEIs faces growing demands for efficiency and competitiveness, implementing smart systems has become increasingly essential. A comprehensive framework is needed to support and improve the chances of successful adoption. This research addressed the question: how can a framework be created to measure campus smartness? The proposed framework encompasses a smart campus definition, an ideal model of smart system-based services, and a model for measuring smartness. The Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) guided the development of the framework. Its evaluation was conducted in Indonesian HEIs to assess current smartness levels. The measurement model was validated through reliability testing (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.883) and validity testing (Pearson Product Moment), both of which yielded strong results. Expert judgment from 10 specialists provided qualitative validation. The framework was applied across 10 campuses, involving 9,961 respondents. The results indicated that anthropocentric smartness (human-focused) was at levels 3 and 4 across all campuses, while systemic and technological smartness were mainly at level 2. Ten university leaders confirmed that the model effectively reflects actual campus conditions. The framework is built upon three perspectives of smartness: anthropocentric, systemic, and technological.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Imbar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a5f854b1d3bfb60dfc43https://doi.org/10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2025.18.3.5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper