PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Scientific Reports19 citationsOpen Access

Deep-learning model for embryo selection using time-lapse imaging of matched high-quality embryos

View Full Paper
LBLisa BoucretFCFloris ChabrunMBMagalie Boguenet

Key Points

  • The deep learning model predicts embryo implantation outcomes, achieving an AUC of 0.64 without prior transfer knowledge.
  • Utilizing time-lapse imaging data from 1580 embryo videos, the model is trained on matched KID embryos.
  • Self-supervised contrastive learning was applied to develop a reliable deep learning model for embryo selection.
  • This model could enhance embryo selection processes and lower unnecessary transfers in IVF treatments.

Abstract

Time-lapse imaging and deep-learning algorithms are promising tools to assess the most viable embryos and improve embryo selection in IVF laboratories. Here, we developed and validated a deep learning model based on self-supervised contrastive learning. The model was developed with a new approach based on matched KID (Known Implantation Data) embryos derived from the same cohort of a stimulation cycle, both judged to be of good quality according to classical morphological criteria and morphokinetics, transferred fresh or frozen, but with a different implantation fate (clinical pregnancy vs. failure of implantation). We used self-supervised contrastive learning to train convolutional neural networks to ensure an unbiased and comprehensive learning of the morphokinetics features of the embryos, followed by a Siamese neural network fine-tuning and an XGBoost final prediction model to prevent overfitting. 1580 embryo videos of 460 patients were included between January 2020 and February 2023. With the knowledge of the implantation outcome of a previous transfer of an embryo derived from the same stimulation cycle, this model could predict the pregnancy outcome of the subsequent transfer with an AUC of 0.57. Without any knowledge of transfer history, the model achieved a satisfactory performance in predicting implantation (AUC = 0.64). This model could be considered as an adjunct tool for biologists to better select embryos and reduce the number of useless transfers per patient, when a cohort with several embryos classified as good quality by classical criteria is obtained.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Boucret et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a76954b1d3bfb60e034ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10531-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group2014 · 308 citations
  2. 2A brief history of artificial intelligence embryo selection: from black-box to glass-box2023 · 58 citations
  3. 3A hybrid artificial intelligence model leverages multi-centric clinical data to improve fetal heart rate pregnancy prediction across time-lapse systems2023 · 47 citations
  4. 4New frontiers in embryo selection2023 · 52 citations
  5. 5Does embryo categorization by existing artificial intelligence, morphokinetic or morphological embryo selection models correlate with blastocyst euploidy rates?2022 · 36 citations