PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Cancers0 citationsOpen Access

Real-World Toxicity and Effectiveness Study of Abemaciclib in Greek Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study

View Full Paper
EFElena FountzilasEAEleni Aravantinou-FatorouKDKaterina Dadouli

Key Points

  • The study confirms the safety and effectiveness of abemaciclib in breast cancer treatment with no new safety concerns identified.
  • Patients with early breast cancer had a 2-year disease-free survival rate of 90.8%, indicating effective treatment.
  • The primary endpoint was toxicity rates, with diarrhea being the most common adverse event reported in 51% of patients.
  • A total of 245 women participated, with 169 receiving treatment for early-stage breast cancer and 76 for advanced disease.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to assess real-world toxicity and efficacy data of patients with early and advanced breast cancer (BC) who received treatment with abemaciclib. Methods: This was a prospective/retrospective multi-institutional collection of clinicopathological, toxicity, and outcome data from patients with early or metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative BC who received treatment with abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy in departments of oncology in Greece. Treatment combinations of abemaciclib with any endocrine therapy were accepted. The primary end point was toxicity rate in all patients of the study. Results: From June/2021 to May/2024, 245 women received abemaciclib/endocrine combination therapy; the median age was 57 years. Of these, 169 (69%) received abemaciclib as adjuvant therapy for early-stage disease, while 76 (31%) were treated for advanced BC. At the time of the data cutoff, 133 (84.7%) patients remained in the 2-year treatment period. The most common adverse event (AE) was diarrhea (51%), primarily Grade ≤ 2. Dose modifications due to AEs were required in 19.2% of cases, while treatment discontinuation occurred in 5.1%. There was no difference in dose modification/discontinuation rates between older patients (>65 years) and the remaining patients. For early-stage BC patients, the 2-year DFS and OS rates were 90.8% and 100%, respectively. In patients with advanced cancer (70, 30.8%), 1-year PFS and OS rates were 78% and 96.3%, respectively. Conclusions: This study confirms the safety and effectiveness of abemaciclib in alignment with registrational trials offering valuable insights into toxicity management and clinical outcomes in routine practice without identifying new safety concerns. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04985058.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fountzilas et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a76954b1d3bfb60e04c8https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152543
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 14CPS-034 Real-world safety and tolerability in patients treated with abemaciclib and endocrine therapy: a retrospective observational study2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Abemaciclib for the Treatment of HR+HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Institutional Experience2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3New treatment strategy for early hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: updated results of adjuvant abemaciclib trial in operable and locally advanced breast cancer2024
  4. 4Real-world analysis of adjuvant abemaciclib in high-risk HR+/HER2− early breast cancer.2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Frequency of dose reductions of abemaciclib in metastatic and early-stage hormone positive, HER2 negative breast cancer.2024