PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)0 citations

Listener and reader perceptions of um and uh

View Full Paper
TGTimothy Gadanidis

Key Points

  • Participants associated um with traits like femininity and thoughtfulness, while uh was linked mainly to hesitancy.
  • The study finds that um is used more frequently by women and younger people, reflecting a change in discourse function.
  • Qualitative and quantitative assessments highlighted significant differences in perception between the two filled pauses.
  • Overall, um may represent a more desirable form of hesitation than uh, suggesting evolving meaning in communication.

Abstract

Abstract Corpus-based research on the “filled pauses” um and uh has shown that um is gaining frequency relative to uh , with um used more frequently by women and younger people. There has been some speculation that the rise of um is linked to a new discourse function or meaning, but this has not yet been fully substantiated. This paper approaches the problem from a perceptual angle, reporting the results of two experiments investigating participants’ judgments of the indexicalities of the “filled pauses” um and uh in two media: instant messaging and speech. Participants’ qualitative and quantitative responses suggest that readers and listeners associate the use of um with hesitancy, femininity, politeness, and thoughtfulness, but that uh is primarily associated just with hesitancy. I argue that these indexicalities may be linked to the ongoing change, with um indexing a potentially more desirable type of hesitation than uh .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Timothy Gadanidis (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a90c54b1d3bfb60e22f1https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23060.gad
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper